26

Ramanujan mentions in one of his letters to Hardy that 15e2π112500+14+25e4π112500+24+=123826979630645625π4coth2(5π) If we put q=eπ we can see that the series is given by n=1n5q2n1q2n12500+n4 While I am aware of the sum n=1n5q2n1q2n=1R(q2)504 and the Ramanujan function R(q2) can be expressed in terms of k,K as R(q2)=(2Kπ)6(1+k2)(12k2)(1k22) (see the derivation of this formula here). For q=eπ we have k=1/2 so that R(q2)=0 and hence n=1n5q2n/(1q2n)=1/504. But getting the factor 1/(2500+n4) seems really difficult.

Any ideas on whether we can get this factor by integration/differentiation (plus some algebraic games) from the series n5q2n/(1q2n)?

Further Update: We have n4+2500=(n2+50)2100n2=(n210n+50)(n2+10n+50) so that n4+2500=(n55i)(n5+5i)(n+55i)(n+5+5i) so I believe we can do a partial fraction decomposition of 1/(n4+2500) but still I need to find a way to sum n5q2n/(1q2n)1/(n+a) i.e. the problem is now simplified to getting a linear factor like 1/(n+a) somehow.

  • I had asked this question on MSE (http://math.stackexchange.com/q/816857/72031) but did not get any helpful answers. Hence asking here. – Paramanand Singh Jul 05 '14 at 12:19

1 Answers1

16

Using (see entry 24 on page 291 in Ramanujan's Notebooks II: http://www.plou) πe2πz2z[cosh(2πz)cos(2πz)]=18πz314z2+π4zn=11z2+(z+n)2 +4zn=1n(e2πn1)(4z4+n4), and n4z4+n4=14z4(nn54z4+n4), we get n=1n5(e2πn1)(4z4+n4)=18πz4+πz24n=1z3z2+(z+n)2 +n=1ne2πn1πz2e2πz2[cosh(2πz)cos(2πz)]. Let us substitute z=5i in this equation. Then πz2e2πz2[cosh(2πz)cos(2πz)]=25π2(1cosh(10π))=25π4sinh2(5π)= 25π4coth2(5π)25π4. Therefore we get n=1n5(e2πn1)(2500+n4)=18π5i4+125in=11(5i+n)225 +n=1ne2πn125π4coth2(5π). Now (see page 6 in David M. Bradley, Ramanujan's formula for the logarithmic
derivative of the gamma function: http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0505125) n=1ne2πn1=12418π, and n=11(5i+n)225=110n=1(1n5+5i1n+5+5i)= 110(n=91n+5+5in=11n+5+5i)=1100n=91n+5+5i. Therefore, calculating the finite sum in (3), 125in=11(5i+n)225=5i4+205940351051076. Substituting (2) and (4) in (1), we get the Ramanujan's formula, because 205940351051076+124=1238269796306456.

Zurab Silagadze
  • 16,340
  • 1
  • 47
  • 92
  • 2
    Thanks for very clear and detailed solution. +1. I had a copy of Ramanujan's Notebooks Vol 2 with me, but it seems I just could not think of this particular entry to connect with the current question. In fact your answer clearly shows that the connection is not so obvious and does require some real labor. – Paramanand Singh Jul 09 '14 at 16:01