15

It is well known that exponentiating the EGF(exponential generating function) for cycles gives the EGF for permutations: link here. Usually summarized under the catchy slogan all = exp(connected).

I wonder if it is possible to give a lie-theoretic explanation to this phenomenon: The similarity to group = exp(algebra) is tantalizing.

Is there some way to relate the counting done by the EGF function to an actual exponential between the 'algebra of cycles' and the group $S_n$? Perhaps there is some way to use the representation theory of $S_n$ to establish some connection? Is this one of those near-misses that holds no deep content?

  • 1
    Some other questions on somewhat similar "exponential formula": https://mathoverflow.net/questions/272045/q-and-other-analogs-for-counting-index-n-subgroups-in-terms-of-homs-to-s?rq=1 – Alexander Chervov Jun 18 '20 at 11:05
  • 2
    I think if there is a deep answer to this question, it might involve a combinatorial interpretation of the BCH formula. – Mark Wildon Jun 18 '20 at 11:55

0 Answers0