3

I don't know if this is a known problem, but I didn't find any similar question.

Let's do some example to explain what I'm searching.

  1. Take n=10. We have p=3 odd prime number and also p+n=3+10=13 prime, so n=10 is not valid
  2. Take n=30. We have p=7 odd prime number and also p+n=7+30=37 prime, so n=30 is not valid
  3. Take n=138. We have p=11 odd prime number and also p+n=11+138=149 prime, so n=138 is not valid

I wonder if there exist an even positive integer n such that, for each odd prime number p, p+n is not itself a prime.

The challenge is to prove that such an integer must exist, or prove that it cannot exist at all.

Any answers or comments will be appreciated.

2 Answers2

4

The answer is no, if you believe the Hardy-Littlewood k-Tuple Conjecture. Let πk(x) denote the number of primes px such that p+2k is also prime. Then the conjecture predicts \pi_{k}(x) \sim C(k) \int_{2}^{x} \frac{dt}{(\ln t)^{2}}, ​ where C(k) = 2\prod_{p>2} \frac{p(p-2)}{(p-1)^2} \prod_{\substack{p\mid k\\ p>2}} \frac{p-1}{p-2}.

Anurag Sahay
  • 1,191
0

The k-tupe conjecture states that for a fixed even number k, they are infinitly primes p satisfying p and p+k are both primes.

In your case you asked if exists an even number n with n+p it not prime for all p\in\mathbb{P}, well the answer depending on the k-tuple conjecture is no !