If the Higgs Boson is supposed to be the particle responsible for other particles having mass. How can it itself have a mass?
Is it not then a 'who came first, the chicken or the egg' situation?
If the Higgs Boson is supposed to be the particle responsible for other particles having mass. How can it itself have a mass?
Is it not then a 'who came first, the chicken or the egg' situation?
No.
The mass of most particles is not a problem. But for the force carriers, i.e. gauge bosons like the gluon or the W and Z bosons, it is a theorem that they must be (naively) massless. But we find that the W and Z bosons act as if they have a mass! The mechanism by which this mass arises is the Higgs mechanism, but we can have masses without it - just not on gauge bosons. Since the Higgs is no gauge boson, it can have mass without its own mechanism (fortunately).
It is not the Higgs boson, but rather the Higgs field, that gives mass to the elementary particles, Higgs boson included. In fact, even in Higgsless theories, e.g. such as a technicolor, the W and Z get mass but there is no Higgs boson (although there is a composite Higgs field made of techniquarks).
Said this, the Higgs boson has a finite mass because its quartic selfcoupling $\lambda$, in the SM, is not vanishing, $V=\lambda(|H|^2-\frac{v^2}{2})^2$, which implies $m_h^2=2\lambda v^2$.