The eigenvalue equation of the $L^2$ operator is given by
$$L^2f_l^m = \hbar ^2l(l+1)f_l^m$$
Side: So a determinate state for some observable $Q$ is a state where every measurement of $Q$ returns the same value (let this value be $q$). Then the standard deviation of $Q$ in a determinate state would be zero, i.e.
$$\sigma ^2 = \big\langle (\hat{Q} - \big\langle Q \big\rangle )^2\big \rangle = 0$$
if every measurement gives $q$, then $\big\langle Q \big\rangle$ = $q$. Then using the rules of Hermitian operators, we can get
$$\hat{Q}f = qf$$
So my question is, given the very first equation, why is the magnitude of $L$, in units of $\hbar$, $\sqrt{l(l+1)}$? The eigenvalue of $L^2$ in units of $\hbar$ is $l(l+1)$.
From what I wrote above, $\big \langle L^2 \big \rangle = l(l+1)$.
In general, $\sqrt{\big \langle L^2 \big \rangle} \neq L$. So why is it that, $L = \sqrt{l(l+1)}$?
I'm trying to understand the magnitude of the $\vec{L}$, which in the common illustration shown to demonstrate that $L_z$ can never be greater than $L$, is said to be $\sqrt{l(l+1)}$. But all they did in Griffiths was take the square root of the eigenvalue of the $L^2$ operator.