Simply Lagrangian without a source for Maxwell equation is $$ L = -\frac{1}{4}F^{\mu\nu}F_{\mu\nu} $$ Also Lorenz Gauge condition is $$ \partial_{\mu}A^{\mu}=0 $$ and if so I can briefly add this into Lagrangian like $$ L = -\frac{1}{4}F^{\mu\nu}F_{\mu\nu}+\frac{1}{2}(\partial_{\mu}A^{\mu})^2 $$ and such a Lagrangian have equations of motions like below: $$ \partial_\nu\partial^{\nu}A^{\mu}=0 $$ Actually this is Klein-Gordon for massless particles, right? So it means I have a massless and spin-0 particle. What does it mean? Am I getting something different?
Asked
Active
Viewed 677 times
2 Answers
1
The equation of motion is
$$\partial^2 A_\mu = 0$$
which in fact is a set of four KG equations, one for each field $A_\mu$, $(\mu = 0,\dots,3)$.
This gives us four degrees of freedom for the $A_\mu$ field. But this cannot describe the electromagnetism, since the light has only two degrees of freedom (polarization).
We must not forget that we have set a gauge condition, $\partial_\mu A^\mu=0$, which removes a degree of freedom. The other degree of freedom is removed using another contraints.

dpravos
- 1,117
-
So here I do not have a scalar field but 4-component massless vector field instead. Since I know photon have 2 dof I should cut the dof down 2. To get this I have to quantize the vector field. I mean I need to write this A vector field as a superposition of incoming and outgoing waves. – aQuestion Jan 06 '15 at 17:17
-
so I can not tell KG equation only for spin 0 particles? or rather I would say only scalar fields should have spin-0 particles? I do not quite get how a field derived from a spin-1(photon) particle can be a solution of KG? – aQuestion Jan 06 '15 at 19:25
0
yes, we have massless particle but not spin zero because A has 4 index.so it is basically four fields. but for EM we have only two states of polarization so it is cut down to two only not four. for refrence see peskin book.

Hare Krishna
- 113
-
polarization of photon is another mystery for me. I know that it has 2 polarization states which are perpendicular to the direction of motion. Is this because of the spin of the photon? And based on your answer A is a massless 4 component vector field but what are these components? Maybe my questions seem a little bit silly sorry for this. – aQuestion Jan 06 '15 at 14:54
-