2

I came across this answer to another stack exchange question and wondered about how true the claim was. https://physics.stackexchange.com/a/174683/42787

It starts with a disclaimer that claims that

A perfect vacuum is impossible

Now I know that perfect absolute zero is a theoretical impossibility because of many theories regarding quantum physics make it so, namely it's impossible to know the position and momentum of atoms at the same time: If they weren't moving you'd know where they were and that they had no momentum. So making something totally absolute zero is impossible. However is there a similar (or even dissimilar) theoretical impossibility regarding a perfect vacuum. If there were no atoms in the space then you'd have nothing to know the position and momentum of.

Because of this question: Why is it impossible to have a perfect vacuum? (and the fact the answers are a little ambiguous anyway) I'm more loosely defining a vacuum as a space that has absolutely no complete atoms or perhaps, if it makes it actually practical to answer, molecules in it at all, ignoring zero point energy, radiation etc.

Lets also assume that the space is defined by a solid container. One that hypothetically doesn't degrade.

I'm not saying that it would be easy, ensuring no residual atoms were present would be practically impossible I'm sure but I see no reason why it would be theoretically impossible. Granted I'm not in any kind of physics related field so my knowledge is rudimentary at best.

0 Answers0