Intuitively, one can find friction to be a non-conservative force. How can one prove that it is non-conservative?
-
1Just check that the usual friction terms do not fulfill the definition of a conservative force. – ACuriousMind Jul 11 '15 at 20:18
-
Related: http://physics.stackexchange.com/q/20929/2451 and links therein. – Qmechanic May 07 '16 at 12:18
2 Answers
A conservative force must satisfy the property that the total work done must be independent of the path traveled. In physics, work is defined as the force along a given path times the distance of this path so that, simply:
$$ \text{work} = \sum_\text{paths} F\cdot l_\text{path} = \sum_\text{paths} \text{force along path}\times \text{path distance} $$
Since force of friction is along the direction one is traveling, taking a different path will accumulate work which is given by
$$ \text{work}_\text{friction} = \sum_\text{paths} F_\text{friction}\cdot l_\text{path} = F_\text{friction}\times\text{length of total path} $$
Finally, since the work done by the friction depends on the path one takes, it is not considered a conservative force.
On a less rigorous note, any force which converts some form of kinetic energy or potential energy into heat will not satisfy the property of a conservative force.

- 341
1.It does not follow law of conservation of mass
2.work done by this force in a loop is equal to zero
3.it depends on path followed by the object (body)

- 15,550