0

My book describes the derivation of the formula $R\approx\hbar/2mc$ by: $$(\Delta E)(\Delta t)\geq\hbar/2$$ The violation of energy conservation is $\Delta E=mc^2$ to create the particle’s mass. Also, the particle travels at relativistic speed, so $R=c\Delta t$. $$(mc^2)(R/c)\approx\hbar/2$$ $$R\approx\hbar/2mc^2$$

However, why is the energy needed to make the particle $mc^2$? The particle is not at rest, so don’t we need to include the kinetic term? Would $E^2=p^2c^2+m^2c^4$ not be a more suitable equation to substitute into Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle?

DanielSank
  • 24,439
lightweaver
  • 1,479

1 Answers1

3

As ACuriousMind says in a comment, this isn't the approach Yukawa used in his 1935 paper (Yukawa H 1935 Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. Japan 17 48) though whether he did that calculation in the privacy of his own notebook only he knows.

The calculation you describe is a rather arm waving sort of justification for the relationship between the mass of the mediating particle and the range, but it shouldn't be taken too literally. You're quite correct that we should be including the kinetic energy not just the rest mass energy, but really this is such a vague calculation that it doesn't make any difference. At best you should regard the calculation as an order of magnitude estimate.

John Rennie
  • 355,118