I feel like this question has been asked before but I can't find it. would the Euler Lagrange equation for, say, the standard model Lagrangian be $$\frac{\partial L}{\partial \phi}=\partial_\mu \frac{\partial L}{\partial (\partial_\mu \phi)}$$ Where $\phi$ is whatever field is an question and $\mu$ is (I believe) being summed from 0 to 3. Or, ist the correct equation $$\frac{\partial L}{\partial \phi}=D_\mu \frac{\partial L}{\partial (D_\mu \phi)}$$ Where $D$ is the covariant derivative of the theory. My intuition tells me its the second eqn but i just wanted to be sure, and I think I once saw someone say that the two were equivalent.

- 201,751

- 377
- 2
- 8
-
2It's the first one. You can just check with the QED Lagrangian and see which one gives you the Dirac equation. – Javier Mar 03 '16 at 02:28
-
Here in this article people derived the (2) equation from the (1) one http://www.stat.physik.uni-potsdam.de/~pikovsky/teaching/stud_seminar/eulerlagrange.pdf – Wellington Martins Feb 01 '18 at 23:11
1 Answers
I) Assuming that the variational problem for the action $S=\int \! d^nx~{\cal L}$ is well-posed (with appropriate boundary conditions), the field-theoretic Euler-Lagrange (EL) equations read in general
$$\tag{1} 0~\approx~\frac{\delta S}{\delta \phi^{\alpha}} ~=~\frac{\partial {\cal L}}{\partial \phi^{\alpha}} -\sum_{\mu} \frac{d}{dx^{\mu}} \frac{\partial {\cal L}}{\partial (\partial_{\mu}\phi^{\alpha})} + \sum_{\mu\leq \nu} \frac{d}{dx^{\mu}} \frac{d}{dx^{\nu}} \frac{\partial {\cal L}}{\partial (\partial_{\mu}\partial_{\nu}\phi^{\alpha})} - \ldots, $$
where the $\approx$ symbol means equality modulo eoms, and the ellipsis $\ldots$ denotes possible higher derivative terms. Note that the spacetime derivative
$$\tag{2} \frac{d}{dx^{\mu}}~=~ \frac{\partial }{\partial x^{\mu}} +\sum_{\alpha}(\partial_{\mu}\phi^{\alpha})\frac{\partial }{\partial \phi^{\alpha}} + \sum_{\alpha, \nu} (\partial_{\mu}\partial_{\nu}\phi^{\alpha})\frac{\partial }{\partial (\partial_{\nu}\phi^{\alpha})} + \ldots $$
is the total spacetime derivative rather than a partial spacetime derivative.
The version (1) of the EL equations is the basic formulation of the EL equations, which always works. Equation (1) holds even for non-covariant theories.
II) Now by imposing further conditions on the theory, such as,
it should be covariant in appropriate sense (e.g. gauge covariant, or general covariant under change of coordinates),
the appearances of spacetime derivatives in the Lagrangian should be minimally coupled via covariant derivatives,
etc,
it is often possible to derive versions of the EL equations where spacetime derivatives $\partial_{\mu}$ and $\frac{d}{dx^{\mu}}$ have been replaced with covariant derivative counterparts of appropriate type (e.g. gauge-type or gravity-type covariant derivatives).

- 201,751