4

The following thought experiment is often used to introduce Special Relativity:

enter image description here

The thought experiment fails to specify which reference frame establishes $\vec{v}$--the observer on earth or the observer in the boxcar.

Determining what $\vec{v}$ should be ( and according to whom ) becomes less trivial in the following example, where there are more than two reference frames and no $\vec{v}$ is given:

An alien spaceship traveling at 0.620 c toward the Earth launches a landing craft. The landing craft travels in the same direction with a speed of 0.790 c relative to the mother ship (as measured by aliens on the mother ship). As measured on the Earth, the spaceship is 0.220 ly from the Earth when the landing craft is launched.

What speed do the Earth-based observers measure for the approaching landing craft?

Solving for $\vec{u}$ according to observers on earth, we use the Lorentz Velocity Transform:

$ \LARGE{ u_x^{'} = \frac{u_x - v}{1 - \frac{vu_x}{c^2}} = 0.946\ c } $

and we use -0.550 c ( the velocity of earth approaching the mothership as observed by aliens on the mothership )--but why? Because the mothership said so, of course.

But, the mothership is traveling at relativistic speeds, so their clocks are subject to time dilation, time is a component of velocity and therefore, one would think, observations of velocity made by the mothership are skewed by time dilation, and the contraction of space.

Suppose we wanted to answer the following question:

What speed do the Earth-based observers measure for the approaching mothership?

How do we determine $\vec{v}$ then?

Qmechanic
  • 201,751
StudentsTea
  • 191
  • 3
  • 12
  • I guess an important point in using the Lorentz Velocity Transform is that all of the observations used in determining $u^{'}_x$ are made in a single reference frame. – StudentsTea Apr 23 '16 at 21:04

1 Answers1

1

It is assumed in the box car example that the observer O on the ground is stationary (meaning the box car is moving past her at a speed $v$), and the observer in the box car is traveling with the boxcar's speed of $v$, and would therefore believe herself to be stationary and the observer outside the box car to be moving backwards with speed $v$ (i.e. velocity = $-v$).

From the outside observers reference frame, the lightning strikes the front and the back of the car simultaneously, and because they are both an equal distance away, and the light from each of the events is traveling at the same speed ($c$), so they will reach the observer O at the same time: $$t = \frac{|B-O|}{c} = \frac{|A-O|}{c}$$

From the reference frame of the observer in the boxcar (O') who is travelling at speed $v$ relative to the ground (or, if you like, for whom the ground appears to be moving backwards at a speed $v$), the light from the from the front of the bus has less distance to travel, as distances in the direction of motion are length contracted. The length to the front of the car is now: $$ L = |B-O'|\sqrt{ \left(1-\frac{v^2}{c^2} \right)} < |B-O'| , $$ because, at the moment of impact, the lightning strike appears to be moving toward the observer at speed v. So, since light travels at the same speed regardless of reference frame, the lightning from the front will reach observer O' before it otherwise would if the car was stationary.

As for the aliens and their landing craft: here we have to use the velocity addition formula for special relativity: $$ s = \frac{u+v}{1+\frac{vu}{c^2}} .$$ u is the velocity of the mothership as soon by an Earth observer, v is the velocity of the landing craft as seen by the mothership, and s is the speed seen by Earth (we are assuming we are in the reference frame of the earth). We assume that the velocities of both the mothership and landing craft are negative, because they are moving toward earth (moving away from Earth would be positive). It says that the spaceship is traveling at $u=-0.620 c$ as measured on Earth, and the landing craft is travelling at $u=-0.790$ as measured by the mothership (though both are still negative, as we defined (+) and (-) from the p.o.v. of Earth), so Earth measures the landing craft at: $$ s = \frac{(-0.620-0.790)c}{1+\frac{(-0.620)(-0.790)c^2}{c^2}} = -0.946c $$

As for why $s$, $u$, and $v$ are defined in the way they are, that goes back to the derivation of these equations, which I hope you're book contains, at the very least in the appendices.

D. W.
  • 1,175
  • Given that the observer in the boxcar is moving at relativistic speeds--would the observer on the ground and the observer in the boxcar agree on their relative velocity? It seems like we're using Galilean Relativity to assume that they would agree, but later on say that their meters and seconds have different lengths ( due to time dilation and Lorentz Contraction ). Unless the amount of time dilation always offsets Lorentz Contraction so that $\vec{v}$ is the same in every reference frame--there is a contradiction. – StudentsTea Apr 23 '16 at 22:26
  • So, I guess what I'm saying is--thank you for working through the problems. But, the boxcar problem is solved in the book and I provide s as calculated in your answer in the original post itself. What I need in the boxcar example is a proof that both observers agree on the magnitude of $\vec{v}$. In the spaceship example, I need some procedure for determining what $\vec{v}$ should be between any two reference frames. – StudentsTea Apr 23 '16 at 22:30
  • 1
    Once you choose a reference frame, velocities are determined in the normal way: change in displacement over change in time. From the ground observers reference frame the lightning strikes are the same distance away and travel at the same speed (c) so reach her in the same time. If we move to observer O', since they are in a boxcar moving at speed v, the lightning at the front is moving toward them at v, and also traveling at c: use the velocity addition formula, with u=v, v=c, and recover the velocity c. But the length is contracted in the direction of motion, so takes less time to travel. – D. W. Apr 23 '16 at 22:41
  • In the alien example, I told you exactly what the procedure was: u is from the rest observers frame, and v is from the moving observers perspective. – D. W. Apr 23 '16 at 22:42
  • Thanks, but again--I'm not trying to determine $\vec{u}$ in the boxcar example; I'm trying to determine if $\vec{v}$ ( the relative velocity of the two reference frames ) really would have the same magnitude if measured by O and O'. – StudentsTea Apr 23 '16 at 22:52
  • Why would the relative velocity (I.e. The velocity of O as measured by O', or the velocity of O' measured by O) be different? – D. W. Apr 23 '16 at 22:53
  • Observations made by both O and O' are subject to time dilation and Lorentz Contraction if either are moving at relativistic speeds. O' certainly is. How can we prove mathematically that O' and O would agree on a value for $\vec{v}$ without using Galilean Relativity? – StudentsTea Apr 23 '16 at 23:01
  • That's what it means for the problem to say "the boxcar moves at a speed v, relative to O," and since O' is in the boxcar, they too are traveling at v w.r.t. O. From O's perspective, O is moving at speed -v. It's defined that way by the problem. – D. W. Apr 23 '16 at 23:05
  • No need to use Galilean relativity at all. If there are other things to worry about than O and O' that are ALSO moving at speeds, then we need to use relativity. – D. W. Apr 23 '16 at 23:06
  • That's my point, though: $\vec{v}$ is given in the boxcar problem, and we are told O and O' agree on its value--without proof. In more complicated problems ( like the spaceship problem ) we are not given the relative velocity of all reference frames, and have to calculate it ourselves. The question that needs to be addressed is as follows, "How do we determine the relative velocities of reference frames moving relativistic speeds if their relative velocity is not given?" – StudentsTea Apr 23 '16 at 23:24
  • No "proof" is needed for the box-car problem. The boxcar moving at speed v means it covers v distance per one unit of time - observer O measures O' moving v units away per unit time, and therefor, if we switch reference frames to be attached to O', O moves backwards v units away per unit time (by the reflexive property I guess, and what it means to change reference frame). In the alien problem, their relative velocities ARE given: "An alien spaceship traveling at 0.620 c toward the Earth..." means the relative velocity of their reference frames is 0.620c – D. W. Apr 23 '16 at 23:39
  • That's the "s" what we calculate when we use the relativistic velocity addition equation: $$ s=(u+v)/(1+uv/c^2) $$ where u is the velocity of the mothership from the perspective of earth, and v is the velocity of the landing ship from the perspective of the mothership. – D. W. Apr 23 '16 at 23:57
  • Something important to note: you say in your comment that the mothership is moving at relativistic speeds, and therefor its clocks are subject to time dilation - but it's important to notice that the time dilation of the spaceships clock only occurs from the perspective of the reference frame (I.e. Earth, in the example). The clocks in the spaceship (i.e. an aliens wristwatch) would tick by as normal, from the perspective of the aliens, and it's the Earth clocks that would be dilated with respect to the aliens reference frame. – D. W. Apr 24 '16 at 00:00
  • 2
    @user1739757 I think you might be interested in the answers to this question: http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/200476/a-question-in-special-relativity – udrv Apr 25 '16 at 06:06
  • I second the suggestion by @urdv to follow the link in his comment, and I particularly commend reading urdv's own answer there. – WillO Jul 26 '18 at 23:13