6

Obviously, sound (like every other causal phenomena) may not travel faster than the speed of light. I know that materials with a high bulk modulus and low density will typically have faster speeds of sound, but is there a theoretical limit due to either a condition relating the density and bulk modulus, or some relativistic condition beneath the propagation of sound?

user121330
  • 2,037

2 Answers2

6

There is no restriction other than $c_s<c$. Relativistic plasmas and fluids explore this regime. A weakly coupled quark gluon plasma has $c_s=c/\sqrt{3}$. Even higher speeds are reached in neutron stars, see Is the speed of sound almost as high as the speed of light in neutron stars? .

The speed of sound is related to the adiabatic compressibility $$ c_s^2 = \left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial \rho}\right)_s \, . $$ This quantity also enters the neutron structure via the TOV equation. It constrains, in particular, the maximum mass and the mass-radius relation. The recent observation of a 2-solar mass neutron star implies that $c_s$ becomes quite large, certainly bigger than $0.5c$.

Adendum: See here for a more quantitative analysis based on the existence of a 2 M(solar) neutron star, and equ.(10) of this paper for a theoretical limit in which we can shows that $c_s\to c$.

Thomas
  • 18,575
  • No equation from the link you provided indicates that $c_s > c/\sqrt3$. Is there a material where we'd expect $c_s > 0.6c$, or could one reasonably say that $c_s < c/\sqrt3$? – user121330 Jun 01 '16 at 19:04
  • @user121330 Added a postscript – Thomas Jun 03 '16 at 12:43
4

Science Progresses!

Per the above link, the theoretical limit for the speed of sound in condensed matter is $$ v_{max} = \alpha c \sqrt{\frac{m_e}{2m_p}} \approx \frac{c}{8304} $$

where $\alpha$ is the fine structure constant, $c$ is the speed of light, $m_e$ is the mass of the electron and $m_p$ is the mass of the proton.

user121330
  • 2,037
  • 1
    It is so satisfying that 4 years later the answer to this question changed because of new science. – AccidentalTaylorExpansion Oct 15 '20 at 17:24
  • It's an amusing paper, but it's not rigorous (just dimensional analysis), and it only applies to solids for which the speed of sound is determined by the bulk modulus, and the scale for the bulk modulus is set by a typical chemical bonding energy. Certainly not relevant to relativistic fluids, such as neutron matter or the quark gluon plasma. – Thomas Oct 17 '20 at 17:54
  • Note that the equation refers to hydrogen; for nuclear matter the relevant mass-ratio would be something involving quark masses, and the fine structure constant replaced by the strong nuclear force counterpart. It is not a general answer to the question, despite the nice paper. – Anders Sandberg Oct 17 '20 at 23:43