2

In August 1932, Anderson photographed a positron originating from cosmic rays as it entered a bubble chamber, passed through a 6mm lead plate (in the process loosing energy, as apparent from the changed radius of its path through the chamber).

My question is, as it passed through the 6mm lead plate it did do some interaction with the lead: it lost energy. Why was the positron not annihilated? In its path it had to pass an estimated 1.6 billion electrons.

What is the proposed mechanism for it to interact with the lead, but avoid annihilation?

DanielSank
  • 24,439
Rolk
  • 73
  • The positron is a charged particle that interacts with (scatters off of) other charged particles. This scattering will result in energy loss, just as for an alpha, electron, or other charged particles. The electrostatic potential is long-ranged, so does not require getting close enough to annihilate. Some positrons likely did die in the lead, but some get through. – Jon Custer Jun 01 '16 at 15:42
  • @JonCuster I mean it'd all be probabilistic whether it annihilates or not right? – snulty Jun 01 '16 at 18:18
  • @snulty - generally, yes, but the details can get hairy (see positron annihilation spectroscopy). – Jon Custer Jun 01 '16 at 18:42
  • @JonCuster It is the fact that the positron is positively charged, and has to find a way through 6mm of lead, some 20 million layers of lead atoms thick, with all those negatively charged electrons along its path that makes me wonder how it is possible for it to loose kinetic energy enough through interactions with those electrons, but not interacting enough with any of these to annihilate. – Rolk Jun 01 '16 at 19:48
  • 1
    But all those interactions with the electrons are through electrostatics (Rutherford scattering, basically - the cross section is directly applicable). To annihilate, the positron has to actually 'hit' an electron, which has a very small cross section, particularly compared with the scattering cross section. And, you are considering fairly energetic positrons that are flying through, not moseying around. – Jon Custer Jun 01 '16 at 19:52
  • This is really no different than other scattering problems. You have a cross section that leads to a scattering probability that can give you a mean free path... – Jon Custer Jun 02 '16 at 00:12

2 Answers2

2

As Jon said in the comments, the mean free path before the electron-positron annihilation is longer than 6 millimeters, or at least not much shorter, and it's simply hard for them to annihilate. Most of the space is empty, the electron and positron are pointlike particles, and they're unlikely to hit each other. The mean free path that indicates the "survival distance" of the positron is proportional to the cross section and it is small.

One may get a quick estimate of the survival time by looking at the positronium. It is a bound state of an electron and a positron – totally analogous to the hydrogen atom but with the positron replacing the proton. They also don't annihilate immediately. The fastest decay channel gives the lifetime $1.244\times 10^{-10}$ seconds which, if multiplied by the speed of light (and the cosmic ray positrons have speeds comparable to the speed of light), gives about $3.7$ centimeters.

(The positronium analogy is OK because the penetrating positron basically forms some positroniums most of the time.)

On the other hand, the losing of the energy is via photons that are emitted and that may have arbitrarily low energies, so it's very easy to emit them. Long before the annihilation takes place (and it is a yes/no big event), lots of low-energy photons are emitted.

At the end, the cross sections (areas determining how hard/easy is to "hit" the target, and therefore the probability of a reaction) should be calculated by Feynman diagrams. All the relevant Feynman diagrams basically have some external electron/positron lines, some photon lines, and they are at the tree level. The annihilation differs by its internal electron line (propagator) that is very far from the "mass shell" because this virtual electron must basically interpolate between the original electron and the original positron, turn its momentum backwards in time. So the $1/(p\cdot gamma-m)$ in the propagator has a large denominator so the fraction (propagator) is much smaller than the propagators of nearly on-shell particles. That's what suppresses the annihilation relatively to the emission of soft enough photons.

It is in no way true that the annihilation happens "first". It is a big event and lots of smaller events are taking place "before" the positron and an electron approach each other closely. Even at a large enough distance, they repel each other a little bit, which makes them accelerate (positrons repel from the nuclei, attract to the electrons, thanks, Anna), and this acceleration would lead to the emission of electromagnetic waves even classically. Because the acceleration is small but nonzero at long distances, the corresponding radiation is of low-frequency, and this is matched in quantum field theory by the omnipresent nonzero probabilities to emit low-energy photons whenever the initial (and final) states contain several charged particles.

Luboš Motl
  • 179,018
  • "Even at a large enough distance, they repel each other a little bit" Repel? – anna v Jun 02 '16 at 05:20
  • Well, the positron repels from the nuclei and attracts to the electrons. When a positron is far from atoms or neutral matter, those two cancel. But if the positron is flying through the matter at distances comparable to the atomic radius, the cancellation isn't exact at every moment and acceleration in a zig-zag way exists, and gives rise to the photons. It's nice you caught this sign but as I mentioned, the correction was just 1/2-right because both signs exist; and the sign of the force doesn't affect the emitted radiation because that scales with the squared acceleration. ;-) – Luboš Motl Jun 02 '16 at 05:38
  • I was thinking of answering this before seeing that you had answered it, and my initial thought was "repels" and then I said, "wait, it is not an electron" :) and the nucleus is very small. Then I thought of van der Waals and a solid has to have lots to be a solid, so you are correct for the 1/2, I think. – anna v Jun 02 '16 at 05:43
1

Likely the dominant process for the positron in the lead plate is simply Bhabha scattering. This is no surprise. We must consider the lab energy of the positron.

At center-of-momentum energies less than twice the muon rest mass, the electron and positron annihilation is limited primarily to radiation of multiple photons. At energies above the eV scale, which is definitely the case for this positron going through 6 mm of lead, the probability of this process occurring is very small. Typically, the positron will need to scatter until it loses enough energy to annihilate.

For a relevant read, see Prantzos, N., C. Boehm, A. M. Bykov, R. Diehl, K. Ferrière, N. Guessoum, P. Jean, et al. “The 511 keV Emission from Positron Annihilation in the Galaxy.” Reviews of Modern Physics 83, no. 3 (September 29, 2011): 1001–56. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.83.1001.

  • "Bhabha scattering" is what I was looking for, but failed to find using ordinary search queries. Thanks for pointing me towards this. @others Thanks for the helpful responses, they are all greatly appreciated! – Rolk Jun 03 '16 at 08:02