-1

While deriving potential energy stored in space due to two stationary opposite charges we end up with negative value of energy which upon on dividing by '$c$ square' provides us negative value of mass. What is the significance of this mass other than reducing the total mass of system of charges. ($c$ stands for speed of light in vacuum).

Qmechanic
  • 201,751
  • If the mass is stored in space then what is happening with the space containing negative mass? – Vasu Goyal Jan 03 '17 at 15:22
  • 2
    Possible duplicates: http://physics.stackexchange.com/q/18925/2451 , http://physics.stackexchange.com/q/34115/2451 , http://physics.stackexchange.com/q/44934/2451 , and links therein. – Qmechanic Jan 03 '17 at 15:22

1 Answers1

3

Let's call the two particles a proton and electron for convenience.

Suppose we start with the proton and electron at rest at some distance $r$ apart. Then to separate the particles to infinity we have to do some work on them. This work is, of course, just (minus) the potential energy $U(r)$.

If we now measure the total mass of the separated particles we find it is just the mass of the proton plus the mass of the electron:

$$ M_\infty = m_p + m_e $$

So far so good, but hang on we had to put in an energy $U(r)$ to separate the two particles and that corresponds to a mass $m = U/c^2$. So if the final mass is $M_\infty$ that must mean that the initial mass was lower:

$$\begin{align} M_r &= M_\infty - U/c^2 \\ &= m_p + m_e - U/c^2 \end{align}$$

And this is quite correct. What you've discovered is that the mass of a bound state is always less that the total mass of its component parts. The difference is the binding energy.

But this doesn't mean there is a negative mass hiding somewhere. It just means that for composite systems mass is a more complicated concept than you thought. The mass of a composite system is not located at any specific point or points - it is a property of the system as a whole.

If you want to pursue this further there are aleady a lot of questions and answers dealing with it.

John Rennie
  • 355,118