To show my current understanding, I'll use alpha decay as an example and list my questions at the end. Could you please correct me if I'm wrong.
An alpha particle forms in the parent nucleus. It's formation releases energy (the binding energy of the alpha particle) causing it to gain kinetic energy. The alpha particle tunnels through the Coulomb barrier and is emitted out of the nucleus.
By conservation of momentum, the daughter nucleus must also gain kinetic energy.
The mass energy of $D$ (daughter nucleus) and of the $\alpha$-particle is less than that of $P$ (the parent nucleus) by conservation of energy with the new kinetic energy.
The $D$ binding energy increases (1), releasing energy, and the $\alpha$-particle's binding energy has also caused energy to be released.
The energy released is given by: binding energy of $D$ $+$ binding energy of $\alpha$-particle $-$ binding energy of $P$. This energy is used as: kinetic energy $D$ $+$ kinetic energy $\alpha$-particle.
This energy released is from the loss of mass energy:
$$(M_p - (M_d + M_{\alpha}))\times c^2 = (B_d + B_{\alpha}) - B_p$$ where $M$ is mass and $B$ is binding energy.
The D binding energy per nucleon always increases, but does the binding energy of $D$ always increase? If not, does this mean that the kinetic energy of the alpha particle and daughter nucleus is all from the release of the alpha particle's binding energy (as the binding energy of $D$ does not increase)?
Daughter nuclei are usually produced with excess energy after a decay. Is this excess energy the kinetic energy of the daughter nucleus, or something else?