1

I am reading a book (Laudau and Lifshitz, Vol. 4, page 94) and it derived why spin-0 should obey Bose quantization and spin-1/2 should obey Fermi Quantization.

Then it says, all integral spin particles should obey Bose quantization and half-integral spin particles should obey Fermi quantization. The reason is integral spin is regarded as "composed" of even number of spin-1/2 particles while half-integral spin is "composed" of odd number of spin-1/2 particles. This is where I don't understand. Why "regarded as composed of even number of spin-1/2 particles" necessitates the use of Bose quantization?

Qmechanic
  • 201,751
hywong
  • 880
  • 1
    Related: http://physics.stackexchange.com/q/17893/2451, http://physics.stackexchange.com/q/65819/2451 , http://physics.stackexchange.com/q/134577/2451 and links therein. – Qmechanic Feb 04 '17 at 22:04

1 Answers1

4

An element of answer is that the tensor product of an even number of copies of the fundamental irrep of $su(2)$, which describes spin-$1/2$ particles (thus fermions), decomposes into a sum of irreps containing only integer values of $j$. For instance, $1/2\otimes 1/2=1\oplus 0$ etc.

Since the fermionic wave function picks up a sign under transposition, the wave function for an even number -say $2n$ - of fermions would pick up a sign $(-1)^{2n}=+1$ under any transposition.

I don't know what Landau had in mind and I don't have that book handy right now, but when it comes to permutations it is possible to think of a system composed of an even number of fermion as bosonic, somewhat like above. He$^4$ is an example of a system of 4 fermions that behaves like a boson. Of course there are fundamental (non-composite) particles that are bosons, so it's suspicious to think of those as a kind of composite of an even number of fermions, but from a representation theory perspective this may be a useful way of getting insight in this issue.

ZeroTheHero
  • 45,515
  • IIRC The Feynman Lectures make a similar argument, although he wouldn't have used the argument of your first paragraph in that text. Now that I come to think of it, he may have just asserted that "spins add" as an assumption - I'll have to dig the relevant bits out now. – Selene Routley Feb 05 '17 at 09:04
  • @WetSavannaAnimalakaRodVance If you find where in FL this argument is made please let me know. I think it's a bit of a sloppy argument - doesn't work for fundamental bosons v.g. photons - and I can't imagine Landau didn't know that, so I'm surprised to hear he would even mention this line of reasoning... but hey... if Landau and Feynman "pushed" this, who am I to be critical. – ZeroTheHero Feb 05 '17 at 13:08