The definition for acoustic decibels is
$$L = 20\log_{10}\frac{P}{P_0}$$
where the reference pressure is $P_0=20\, \mu \mathrm{Pa}$ in air. Thus $L=1100\,\textrm{dB}$ would give
$$P = 2\times 10^{50}\,\mathrm{Pa}.$$
There is no physics up to here, just definitions. The gist of the claim, I guess, is to naively apply acoustic, even though that pressure is too high to make any sense. The energy density of a wave would be
$$w = \frac{P^2}{\rho c_s^2}$$
where $\rho$ is the mass density and a $c_s$ the sound speed. For air, $\rho \approx 1\, \mathrm{kg}/\mathrm{m}^3$ and $c_s\approx 300\, \mathrm{m}/\mathrm{s}$, so
$$w \approx 10^{98}\,\mathrm{J}/\mathrm{m}^3.$$
What to do with that number? Not sure. A black hole forms when 3-4 solar masses collapse. The corresponding total energy, naively using $E=mc^2$, is $E_\bullet \approx 10^{48}\,\mathrm{J}$. Clearly, as @AndersSandberg found out too, this acoustic wave energy is way higher than this threshold. So collapse, yes, but the specific number 1100 dB had me believe that this would be a threshold.
Another idea, would be to consider how small a volume would get us to the threshold of black hole collaspse: if the above energy density $w$ is contained in a volume $V=E_\bullet/w=10^{-50}\,\mathrm{m}$, we are there. That would be a cube of dimension $\approx 10^{-17}\,\mathrm{m}$, which is 1/100th of a proton radius. This makes no particular sense.
We can run it the other way around by taking a volume of $V=1\, \mathrm{m}^3$, and require $w = E_\bullet/V\approx 10^{48}\,\mathrm{J}$, which using the acoustic formula for $w$ gives $P\approx10^{26}\,\mathrm{Pa}$, and therefore a level of $\approx 600\,\mathrm{dB}$. So from that perspective, the claim should say 600 dB instead of 1100 dB. Note this is not the same thing as what @AndersSandberg calculated.