3

Lets consider a ultra cold neutron gas in a gravitational potential. The known quasi-classical energy up to the classical turning point is

$$ E_n =\sqrt[3]{\frac{9m}{8}(\pi\hbar g (n-\frac{1}{4}))^2} $$ My question is that in this potential that has a vertical axis representing the potential $U(z)$ and $x$ horizontal axis representing the width of the well $z$, what would the potential be beyond the classical turning point?

enter image description here

Qmechanic
  • 201,751

1 Answers1

2

Well, the form of the potential beyond the turning point depends on what's there.

When Nesvizhevsky et al did this at ILL, the lower surface was a neutron mirror, and the upper surface was an absorber. (Actually I can't access that paper at the moment, so perhaps I'm misremembering; I'll correct if necessary.)

A good model for the mirror is a uniform Fermi pseudopotential of about 100 neV inside the mirror, and zero out; a good model for an absorber is a psuedopotential with a real part near zero, and a nonzero complex part which causes the neutrons to disappear as time evolves.

Note that the Nesvizhevsky-type experiments were with a collimated beam of UCNs, so that the part of their kinetic energy in the vertical direction was quite small compared to the "usual" UCN energy of 100 neV. A "gas" suggests something more like the PNPI GraviTrap, which had no lid, and for which I don't believe there's been any evidence of quantized gravitational states.

rob
  • 89,569