2

Molecules interchange translational energy by collisions. But,

  • How do rotational and vibrational modes hold its population in equilibrium?

I'll explain in more detail.

Take a gas composed by diatomic molecules in some vessel of fixed volume, at temperature $T$ high enough in order that rotational and vibrational modes contribute to $C_v$, once equilibrium is reached. Then:

  • Is the energy exchange only between same states? $$vib\rightarrow vib\\ rot \rightarrow rot\\ trasl\rightarrow trasl$$

Or there is a mess of crossed terms? Or the initial state is always translation? Does radiation play any role or only collisions are important?

If the questions are too broad, please, help me to know where to search about the issue.

  • 2
    Can you clarify what you are asking. In an isolated molecule vibrational and rotational modes cannot exchange energy because they would violate conservation of angular momentum. In collisions there is generally a non-zero angular momentum so rotational modes can be excited. Equilibrium in a gas is normally achieved via collisions. – John Rennie Sep 14 '18 at 06:46
  • @JohnRennie I've tried my best to be clear. Anyways, I hope it's better now. I'cant understand why radiation is not important. –  Sep 14 '18 at 15:23
  • Possibly related. Generally the temperature at which vibration freezes out is hotter than the same transition for rotation. – rob Sep 14 '18 at 15:46

1 Answers1

2

Imagine for example the H$_2$ molecule as two spheres connected by a spring. Now imagine an off-center collision of two such molecules in a way so that only one of the spheres from each molecules end up participating in the collision. Since one of the spheres of each molecule sees a change in momentum while the other does not, they will start diverging. However, their coupling will try to pull the diverging molecules back together. Depending on the details of the collision, the two-sphere molecule will generally start rotating about its center of mass as well as oscillating. This is the transfer of translational energy into vibrational and rotational degrees of freedom.

Once you start considering collisions where the molecules are already initially vibrating and rotating, you will realize that collisions can also transfer rotations and vibrations into translational energy and also rotations and vibrations between the molecules. There is really no restriction between the channels, every form of kinetic energy can be transferred to any other one.


As for the activation of the vibrational degrees of freedom, this requires to think about quantum mechanics. This is because if your molecules were purely classical, then no matter how stiff the ``molecular spring'' would be, vibrational degrees would be activated (and would receive their fair share of $k_\mathrm{B} T/2$ of the energy on average).

The point is, however, that the spacing of the quantum energy levels is $\hbar \omega$, where $\omega$ is the vibrational frequency of the spring. We can then estimate the activation by considering the partition between the ground state of the vibrations and the first excitation. The relative proportion of the first excitation will then be $$\approx \exp\left(-\frac{\hbar \omega}{k_\mathrm{B} T}\right)$$ at least at low temperatures. We see that whenever $\hbar \omega \gg k_\mathrm{B} T$ the proportion of molecules with excited vibrational degrees of freedom is negligible. On the other hand, whenever $k_\mathrm{B} T \gg \hbar \omega$, the occupation of all the vibrational levels will be high and we can even go to the classical limit of the vibrational degree of freedom. (Then again, when $k_\mathrm{B} T \gg \hbar \omega$ the harmonic approximation of the spring will likely be breaking and you might even be dissociating your molecules at appreciable rates).


As for radiation, that is not really different. Collisions as well as relaxation of the vibrational degree of freedom will generally produce photons. If the ensemble is in thermal equilibrium, you will have a photon gas inside it taking up a fair share of internal energy. Depending on the conditions, this may or may not form an appreciable fraction of the pressure and or internal energy of the system.

The only thing that can be relevant I can think of in this context is the fact that the mean life-time of the first vibrational excitation is $\tau = 1/\omega$. If this time is considerably shorter than the typical time between collisions, then the vibrational excitation can be assumed to be out of thermal equilibrium and damped by the radiation (at least if radiation is leaking from the system). However, this will usually occur only for gases where the fraction of thermally excited vibrations would be negligible already by the previous argument.

Void
  • 19,926
  • 1
  • 34
  • 81
  • I love the way to describe it. Thanks a lot. So, it would be a good idea to explain why vibrational states aren't important at low temperature by using a hard-constant-spring, isn't it? (I am not sure how to do it for rotational states). Do you know any program to make animations of what you describe? And what about the second part of my question (referred to radiation)? –  Sep 14 '18 at 15:34
  • 1
    @santimirandarp Rotation is always active, but vibration is active only at large temperatures due to quantum effects. I made adjustments to the answer to address your edits to the question. Unfortunately, I cannot really think of a program where animations like that could be created very easily right now. (I can think of various brute solutions, of course.) – Void Sep 14 '18 at 16:52
  • Wouldn't rotation freeze out as well for low temperatures due to quantization of orbital angular momentum? – Gabriel Golfetti Sep 14 '18 at 16:59
  • So internal energy of the system is Q +W + radiation energy? At low temepratures there will be no vibrational excitations but rotational –  Sep 14 '18 at 17:10