1

Let's say our Lagrangian looks something like this:

$$L = \int dz\, Q\cdot \dot{A},\tag{1}$$

where $Q$ and $A$ are two generalized coordinates and $\dot{Q}$ and $\dot{A}$ would be the respective time-derivatives. If I wanted to Legendre-transform this, then considering the conjugate momenta $$P_Q = \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{Q}} = 0\tag{2}$$ and $$P_A = \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{A}} = Q\tag{3}$$ the Hamiltonian becomes:

$$H = P_Q\dot{A}-L= \int dz\,\, Q\cdot \dot{A} - Q\cdot \dot{A} = 0.\tag{4}$$

Is this correct? What does that even mean for the physical system?

Qmechanic
  • 201,751
xabdax
  • 239

1 Answers1

3

Recall that the purpose of the Legendre transformation from Lagrangian to Hamiltonian formalism is to bring the equations of motion on first-order form. This is where the Faddeev-Jackiw method is so much simpler [than the traditional Dirac-Bergmann analysis which OP just performed]: OP's Lagrangian $Q\dot{A}$ is already on first-order form $p\dot{q}-H$ if we identify $$ q~=~A,\qquad p~=~Q,\qquad H~=~0~!$$ A vanishing Hamiltonian means that all phase space variables are constants of motion. It reflects the world-line (WL) reparametrization invariance of the action, cf. e.g. this & this related Phys.SE posts.

Qmechanic
  • 201,751