In discussing geometrical optics, Fermat's principle of least time is often used to solve problems and is generally used as a replacement of laws of reflection and refraction. Fermat's principle is usually presented as an intuitive idea, but I wish to find a way where we can show that is is actually a result of least of reflection and refraction. We have explanation for laws of reflection and refraction and they must be the basic laws, with Fermat's principle being a consequence of it. Do we have any explanation suggesting that Fermat's principle is the direct consequence of laws of reflection and refraction?
Asked
Active
Viewed 100 times
0
Qmechanic
- 201,751
Yashkalp Sharma
- 349
- 2
- 4
- 11
-
Related: https://physics.stackexchange.com/q/2041/2451 , https://physics.stackexchange.com/q/100317/2451 , https://physics.stackexchange.com/q/257140/2451 and links therein. – Qmechanic Aug 25 '19 at 10:15
-
Sir, how my question is related to the one you mentioned, I wish to find a way to prove Fermat's principle using reflection and refraction. – Yashkalp Sharma Aug 25 '19 at 10:24
-
Do you know the optical laws for reflection and refraction? – Qmechanic Aug 25 '19 at 10:31