3

In general relativity,  the fundamental notions are the curvature (Ricci tensor) and the stress energy tensor. Energy density and curvature are connected . 

The Casimir vacuum between parallel plates could fulfill the negative energy density requirements (positive energy density for Casimir spherical shells as far as I know  , but I don't have strong references in this direction). 

In vacuum,  in the absence of any other forces or fields,  does matter tend to follow the gradient of the vacuum energy density ( for example from high vacuum energy density to low vacuum energy density )?

In vacuum,  in the absence of any other forces,  a ship with a large number of Casimir plates at one end (I won't bother to put spherical shells at the other end), will it tend to move without the need of any fuel (as slow as it may)?

A picture's worth a thousand words. View here .

In this design the Casimir plates are parallel to the direction of travel. A similar design could be considered, where the Casimir plates are orthogonal to the direction of travel.The ship moves for the same reason the plates are pushed together in the original Casimir experiment, following the gradient of the vacuum energy density.

If not, please explain.

Cristian Dumitrescu
  • 941

3 Answers3

3

In vacuum, in the absence of any other forces or fields, does matter tend to follow the gradient of the vacuum energy density ( for example from high vacuum energy density to low vacuum energy density )?

I understand your design and the crux of the question is the one above.

In this link, pressure as energy density is discussed.

Pressure in a fluid may be considered to be a measure of energy per unit volume or energy density. For a force exerted on a fluid, this can be seen from the definition of pressure:

$$P=\frac{Force}{Area}=\frac{F}{A}=\frac{F\cdot d}{A\cdot d}=\frac{W}{V}=\frac{Energy}{Volume}$$

If one considers the energy density of space as a fluid then it seems there would be a pressure difference that could create a propulsion. So it would be the pressure, on the matter on one side, to lack of pressure on the Casimir side. Too many ifs in the process though. It would not be a complicated experiment though.

anna v
  • 233,453
  • https://physics.stackexchange.com/q/504630/31339 This is a more precise question. Your feedback will be appreciated @annav Had a little issue with the posting rules. – Cristian Dumitrescu Sep 26 '19 at 16:25
1

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20110015936.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwi00rfH4uHkAhVCyaYKHXJECb8QFjAAegQIAxAB&usg=AOvVaw214vpEClifvcvPQCaBLUTx This is from NASA website on advanced propulsion research. They are playing around with this micro warp fields to try to measure something tangible. Point is even if the force is small it's still great for space travel cause you have a long way to accelerate and there is no drag. But this is still based on GR , and GR is just a math model, granted with decent predictive power and insight into some deeper truths , but it's far from the best picture of reality. People online can only try to tackle this problem combining GR and qft but that just doesn't work ,cause they are just some empirical math models used for their respective purposes and based on that they can neither refute nor confirm your idea. I saw your drawing and yes it's an interesting point creating lower density of vacuum on one side and somehow keeping the plates from closing down so that lower density persists . But I will bet you anything this kind of physics is classified. It has nothing to do with typical politics ,left or right, I don't care about that.i haven't made the experiment nor have the theoretical knowledge as no other physicist has to talk about applications of quantum vacuum

Kugutsu-o
  • 856
-1

No it wouldn't. It's like you being in space pulling the the earth with large rope you will move towards the earth much more that the earth will move to you, in the end momentum will be conserved , so no net movement in either direction. That being said NOBODY can tell you that warp drive or even pulling momentum and energy from " nothing" ( vacuum) is impossible. QFT is based on flat space so that means conserved momentum and energy is basically an axiom, GR requires negative energy for propulsionless drives which hasn't been found yet which doesn't mean it won't ever be found. Both theories fundamentally being incomplete there is always a possibility . But you have to go back to reality. Even if warp drive turns out to be possible or even operational, you'll be the last to know about it, since in this world money is first priority. Given a long history of scientist taking part in cover-up in the interest of industry, any threat, like the possibility of propulsion not based on Newton's 3rd law, to the multi trillion dollars petrol industry will be utterly dismissed .

Kugutsu-o
  • 856
  • 3
    The last part about a conspiratorial cover-up by the petrol industry ruins an otherwise good answer. If people discovered a better engine/source of power you can bet that governments or companies would be tripping over themselves trying to make use of it. – Dast Sep 20 '19 at 11:49
  • Momentum exchange with the QED vacuum is not an easy problem. I don't know the answer to my own question (that's why I asked it), but I suspect you would need the mathematical framework of QED, general relativity, and the mathematics behind the Casimir effect. Slightly more complicated than the system you describe in your answer. – Cristian Dumitrescu Sep 20 '19 at 12:10
  • 1
    It's simple anything in physics or math that has a potential military / industrial potential will be swallowed by deep black projects, and most breakthroughs in actual applicable physics and math will come in such projects , the very computer you write post in owes its existence to one such project and Alan Turing. You can dribble around about strings ,loops and whatnot, cause at the end of the day it's harmless in the military and economical sense, – Kugutsu-o Sep 20 '19 at 17:35
  • @LeoKovacic I added a picture of the design in my question . I would appreciate your opinion. – Cristian Dumitrescu Sep 21 '19 at 08:05
  • 1
    And you have to slow down with the politics my left wing bro, I don't care about all that, true or false. It's the science that tickles my interest. And if you mentioned Alan Turing, don't forget Leibniz, Charles Babbage, Ada Lovelace, Emil Post, Alonzo Church and many others. Neither one of them worked at Bletchley Park, and they paved the way for Turing to make that breakthrough. Anyway, that's unrelated to my question. – Cristian Dumitrescu Sep 21 '19 at 08:42
  • https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20110015936.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwiiqqSX3OHkAhVqoosKHR0cBFsQFjAAegQIARAB&usg=AOvVaw214vpEClifvcvPQCaBLUTx – Kugutsu-o Sep 21 '19 at 10:37