7

Do photons have kinetic energy?

If a photon of radio wave and a photon of gamma wave moves at the same speed, how can both of them have different energies?

jovian
  • 430
  • Essentially a dupe of https://physics.stackexchange.com/q/180977/25301 – Kyle Kanos Dec 14 '19 at 04:02
  • 2
    @KyleKanos not really, did not see a good answer there – anna v Dec 14 '19 at 05:00
  • 2
    @annav dupes are proposed not necessarily because of (the entirely subjective basis of) "good answer" but on what the question actually asks. In this case, the questions are fairly similar; however I did not vote to close it as a duplicate. – Kyle Kanos Dec 14 '19 at 12:12

6 Answers6

10

Yes. The relativistic definition of kinetic energy $K$ for a particle of mass $m$ is

$$K=E-mc^2=\sqrt{(mc^2)^2+(pc)^2}-mc^2\approx\frac{p^2}{2m}+…$$

where $E$ is the relativistic energy and $p$ the relativistic momentum.

Set $m=0$ and you get

$$K=E=pc$$

for a photon. This relation involves only Special Relativity.

In addition, quantum mechanics tells us that the energy is related to the angular frequency $\omega$ by

$$E=\hbar\omega$$

and the momentum is related to the wavenumber $k$ by

$$p=\hbar k$$

so we get the expected relation between angular frequency and wavenumber for an electromagnetic wave,

$$\omega=kc.$$

The photons of a radio wave and a gamma wave have different frequencies and thus different energies, and also different wavenumbers and thus different momenta. They may have the same speed $c$ but they have different $\omega$, $k$, $E$, and $p$ and this makes them interact differently with other particles.

G. Smith
  • 51,534
9

It is called special relativity, and it is the kinematics ruling at the level of particles and of large velocities generaly, close to the speed of light.

The concept of Energy in special relativity includes the energy inherent in the rest mass of the system .

$$\sqrt{P\cdot P}=\sqrt{E^2-(pc)^2}=m_0c^2$$

Here p is the momentum vector of the particle, and one can say the $(pc)$ is the kinetic energy term of the particle in special relativity. When mass equals zero, as with the photon, the total energy is kinetic energy. For photons the $E=hν$ holds, where $h$ is Planck's constant and $ν$ the frequency of light.

Thus, it is the difference in the frequency that differentiates a gamma ray photon and a radio wave photon.

anna v
  • 233,453
  • 3
    one can say the $(pc)^2$ is the kinetic energy of the particle Did you mean $pc$? The quantity $(pc)^2$ has the dimensions of energy squared. – G. Smith Dec 14 '19 at 06:39
  • @G.Smith right, thanks for the correction – anna v Dec 14 '19 at 13:38
  • 1
    @anna v Isn’t it very odd that, referring a light wave, energy increases as the frequency increases; while referring a sound wave, energy decreases as the frequency increases. –  Dec 15 '19 at 02:32
  • 2
    @user248881 http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/mod6.html Actually for light only in the wrong solution of the classical em wave the energy goes up with frequency ; that is why quantization of black body radiation was discovered. Due to quantization the number of modes falls with frequency. The ν in the individual quantum energy goes up with frequency, not the light wave energy – anna v Dec 15 '19 at 08:10
  • @anna v Isn’t it also surprising that, how a tiny photon of gamma ray and a large photon of a radio wave has the same speed of propagation. Thank you very much for helping me out. –  Dec 16 '19 at 01:23
  • 2
    @user248881 In the standard model of particle physics all photons are point particles, i,e, have no size. They do not have extent in space, the only difference between a gamma and an infrared photon is in the energy. The E=hν. The Planck constant transforms energy to a number that miraculously is the frequency of the light that will be built up by zillion such photons. All this can be shown with mathematics. The tiny describes energy, not extent. – anna v Dec 16 '19 at 05:30
  • @anna v But in reality, a photon of radio wave is larger than a photon of a gamma wave, am i right or wrong? Now look at this video and focus between 2:00 to 7:54. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KM2TkM0hzW8) Isn’t he using a single photon of microwave which has larger size? I am guessing so because look the polaroid, he is using. –  Dec 16 '19 at 08:34
  • 1
    @user248881both no, all photons are point particles with zero mass . There are no larger or smaller in space, their volume is zero. only the energy differentiates them. The wave nature appears in the accumulation of didtributions for thousands of photons. see this http://www.sps.ch/en/articles/progresses/wave_particle_duality_of_light_for_the_classroom_13/ . the plot would be the same for infrared too, with the appropriate slits and detectors of impact. only the right most frame shows space differences of intensity – anna v Dec 16 '19 at 09:23
  • @anna v So we can differentiate photons by their energies, am i right? Does their energy comes from vibration? Is individual photon vibrating and do they have frequency? If they have frequency, then are all photons of red laser have same frequency and do they differ from blue laser? –  Dec 17 '19 at 02:16
  • 1
    Look at E=hν .That is the energy of a photon, and h is a constant.It is the ν that differentiates red and blue. No, their energy comes from the initial interaction that created them, either scattering or deexcitation of atoms/molecules/lattices. They do not vibrate. The wave nature comes in the probability of detectting them, i.e. many of them with the same frequency show a wave nature.See http://www.sps.ch/en/articles/progresses/wave_particle_duality_of_light_for_the_classroom_13/ – anna v Dec 17 '19 at 05:28
  • 1
    @anna v I know i’m asking some really stupid questions to a great particle physicists and yet she’s spending her important time to reply me. Thank you very very much! –  Dec 17 '19 at 15:38
5

Photons behave a little like mechanical objects and a little like their own thing in this regard.

Suppose you have a squirt gun that shoots a series of water droplets. If you sit still with respect to the gun, the droplets hit you with a certain frequency, momentum, and energy. If you run toward the gun, the frequency, momentum, and energy all go up.

The energy of a photon is proportional to its frequency. $E = h \nu$.

If you run upstream into a beam of light. The frequency increases because of the Doppler shift. And so do the momentum and energy of the photons. If you ran at a suitable relativistic velocity, you could turn a radio wave into a gamma ray wave.

At the same time, you do not increase the speed the photons travel with respect to you by running. They always travel at the speed of light.

mmesser314
  • 38,487
  • 5
  • 49
  • 129
3

Yes.

Moreover, you could say the energy of a photon is purely kinetic energy.

In relativity theory, massive particles have both kinetic energy and a potential energy which is proportional to their mass. Photons have no mass, hence their energy is purely, and wholly, kinetic.

2

It is very confusing when you read the definition of kinetic energy (the energy of a particle that it possesses due to its motion), and since both photons (with different wavelength) travel at the same speed c, you could think they should have the same kinetic energy.

It is defined as the work needed to accelerate a body of a given mass from rest to its stated velocity. Having gained this energy during its acceleration, the body maintains this kinetic energy unless its speed changes. The same amount of work is done by the body when decelerating from its current speed to a state of rest.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_energy

But the photon is massless, and it does not have a rest frame, it by definition travels at speed c.

Photons always travel at speed c in vacuum, when measured locally. Its energy and momentum are related by E=p*c (where p is the magnitude of the momentum vector).

$E^{2}=p^{2} c^{2} + m^{2} c^{4}$

Since the photon is massless, this will reduce to E=pc.

The energy and momentum of the photon only depend on its frequency or inversely on its wavelength. $E=h\nu=\frac{hc}{\lambda}$

$p=\frac{h\nu}{c}=\frac{h}{\lambda}$

The photons energy (E) is kinetic energy (p*c) and in your case the different wavelength photons have different energy and momentum. Still, they both travel at speed c in vacuum when measured locally.

-1

massless things can never have inertia, nor momentum.

ki·net·ic en·er·gy /kəˈnedik ˈenərjē/ nounPhysics noun: kinetic energy; plural noun: kinetic energies

energy which a body possesses by virtue of being in motion.

you need MASS to have inertia, light i.e. photons have none.

however i can still answer the part about why "a radio wave and a photon of gamma wave moves at the same speed, how can both of them have different energies?"

the answer is that the higher the frequency you go with electromagnetic waves, the more energy they have.

for example light that is red will have less energy than light that is blue. and ultraviolet light will have even more !

gamma waves are at the highest level that have been detected by mankind. they are exceedingly high in frequency.