-5

Some forces are perpendicular to the displacement of a body placed in a "vehicle", if the vehicle at rest. But, the motion of "vehicle" causes the body to move in some direction not perpendicular to the force. Now, the net displacement no longer remains perpendicular to the forces. And they start to do work on the body. We need to find the work done by such forces on the body, in such situations.

To have a feel of what I want to say, Let's have a look at following two problems:-

  1. There is a pendulum in a car, both car and pendulum are at rest. Till now, tension forces appear as if they never do any work on the mass (if displaced slightly). Now, the car starts moving. For the mass to follow string constraint it must also move forwards. The displacement of the mass no longer remains perpendicular to the tension. Hence, tension does work in this situation.

enter image description here

  1. Another such popular example is the work done by Normal force acting on a block placed on a movable inclined wedge, both free to move, over a journey from A to B. Here, Normal does not do any work on the mass(if allowed to slide through a distance), when the wedge is at rest, but the movement of wedge forces normal to do work. For any displacement of the mass relative to the wedge the work done by normal is zero. But, the wedge is also moving.

enter image description here

I just wanted to know whether we could have some nice simplification of the formula $$W_{F} = \int_{A}^{B}\mathbf{F}\cdot\text d\mathbf{s}$$ in order to find the work done by such forces when the "vehicle" is also in motion.

ImBatman
  • 127
  • 15
  • There is a pending close review on this question. Offering a bounty stops users from being able to vote to close a question, so I have refunded your bounty. You can offer it again after the close review has concluded. – ACuriousMind Aug 06 '20 at 14:39
  • 1
    I think the reason for the downvote about the question is two fold 1. The head and tail of the question doesn’t really fit together, the “motion” of the vehicle does work (you also forgot the implicit assumption that the “motion” is accelerating motion, if it’s constant velocity, there should be no work done), so what? Of course if the object is accelerating, there should be work. The simplification of the integral F dot ds is another matter altogether! – Henry Oh Aug 12 '20 at 17:17
  • The examples you give is also weird, on the first example, yes, the string is doing work, so? If the ball is inside a box, and the box is accelerating, of course something has to accelerate the ball, doing work. On the second example, normal force does not do work! Because on that logic gravity will do work, and it will exactly be in the opposite direction, counteracting the work by the normal force. Or rather, the net force on the block is zero (I’m assuming both block and wedge is moving at constant speed) so the net work is zero as well.
  • – Henry Oh Aug 12 '20 at 17:24
  • @user208685 No! even if the vehicle moves with constant velocity there should be work in the both cases see this for the second case (first is similar) https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/571554/work-done-by-normal-force-on-a-block-placed-on-movable-inclined-wedge . The matter essentially is that there is a component of displacement in the direction of force hence work has to be done. – ImBatman Aug 13 '20 at 02:58
  • Huh, correction partly withdrawn, I was wrong that normal force does not do work on a constant speed reference frame, but I’m still sure the work by normal force and gravity is the same, resulting in normal force’s work not having any effect. I do believe some of my other points do still stand, and the question could use a bit of edit. – Henry Oh Aug 13 '20 at 05:12
  • One must keep in mind that the work on a specific volume element of a body, just like velocity and momentum, is not a frame-indifferent quantity. That is, its value depends on the observer's reference frame. This happens because it's defined in terms of a frame-indifferent quantity (force) and a frame-dependent one (velocity). However, the total work done on a body is frame-indifferent. See for example A First Course in Rational Continuum Mechanics. – pglpm Aug 14 '20 at 09:12
  • @Don'tWorry Well in the first picture you can read that the velocity of the vehicle $\vec v=\vec{a} t$, which implies the vehicle is accelerated. If the motion was constant you could always carry out a Galilean transformation after which the velocity of the vehicle is zero, implying that the work done doesn't change. – Deschele Schilder Aug 15 '20 at 05:12
  • @Don'tWorry Also, in the first picture the string shows an angle with the vertical, implying acceleration. – Deschele Schilder Aug 15 '20 at 05:18
  • @descheleschilder The picture was just for the purpose of illustration. Even if the vehicle moves with constant velocity there must be work done by the tension force on the body this problem is quite similar https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/571554/work-done-by-normal-force-on-a-block-placed-on-movable-inclined-wedge – ImBatman Aug 16 '20 at 04:30
  • 1
    Take a good look at the comments made by @user208685. He's got a good look on the situation! – Deschele Schilder Aug 16 '20 at 08:50