A counter argument - an object with negative inertial mass will accelerate in the opposite direction to an applied force, since $\vec F = m \vec a$. So if the force of gravity on the ball is repulsive then the force on the ball is upwards but the ball will fall towards the earth because it accelerates in the opposite direction to the applied force.
This assumes, of course, that a negative gravitational mass implies a negative inertial mass, and vice versa.
The earth, having a normal positive mass, will be repulsed too (assuming Newton's Third Law still holds) and will accelerate away from the ball. Because of its large mass the earth will only move a small distance before the ball catches up with it.
However, if we had two masses of $1$ kg and $-1$ kg in empty space, we would seem to have created a situation in which the negative mass continually accelerates towards the positive mass, and the positive mass continually accelerates away from the negative mass. This looks very much like a source of free energy, so - oh dear - we have just broken the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
The simple fact of the matter is that we do not know how an object with negative mass would behave because we have never observed such an object. In the absence of experimental data, we can only guess.