0

I am studying relativistic quantum mechanics and I can't really understand how propagators arise from the theory.

They are generally defined as the Wightman function $$ W_F (t',\vec{x}', t,\vec{x}) \equiv \langle{0| \phi(t, \vec x) \phi(t', \vec x') |0}\rangle. $$

I understand that the state $\phi(t, \vec x)| 0\rangle $ is the state representing an elementary particle of the field. The propagator gives us information about how two points $\vec x, \vec x' $ are related and also is a kernel so it can be solved using Green's functions. My question is: why are propagators Wightman functions? Are they supposed to be interpreted as the probability of transition between two points $\langle t, \vec x|t', \vec x' \rangle$? In what way is the Wightman function related to the probability of transition between two points?

Qmechanic
  • 201,751
  • Possible duplicate: https://physics.stackexchange.com/q/20797 – Nihar Karve Feb 13 '21 at 12:21
  • In that question the propagator is defined not derived, my question is regarding the interpretation of Wightman function as propagators, why is that justified? – Summoned Egar Feb 13 '21 at 12:28
  • Fair enough. I hadn't actually flagged it as a duplicate; consider it a related question for future readers who aren't as familiar with the term "Wightman function". You may find https://physics.stackexchange.com/q/273780 useful. – Nihar Karve Feb 13 '21 at 12:30

0 Answers0