I'm trying to understand fermion fields with the Feynman integral. Is there an explicit matrix representation of the Grassmann numbers used in the field integral? Is there a Grassmann-valued measure that results in the Berezin integral? In my book, they just introduce the algebraic relations $ab = -ba$ with no construction of $a$ or $b$, and I'm having trouble visualizing it.

- 201,751
-
1For matrix representations, see https://physics.stackexchange.com/q/95259/50583 and its linked questions – ACuriousMind Mar 27 '21 at 19:46
-
Related: Basic Grassmann/Berezin Integral Question – Qmechanic Mar 27 '21 at 20:02
2 Answers
You are not alone in this. I tend to regard the Grassmann integral as tool for combinatorics, but if you want a deeper view and a discussion of analytic subtleties you might like to read Martin R. Zirnbauer, Riemannian symmetric superspaces and their origin in random-matrix theory, J. Math. Phys.\ 37 (1996) 4986; arXiv:math-ph/9808012.

- 52,996
Grassmann variables are just a convenient way of representing determinants in path integrals. Hence the anti-commutativity. There is some similarity with Slater determinants, which represent fermions in multi-particle quantum mechanics.
What is kind of strange, is that determinants also appear in gauge-fixed path integrals of Yang-Mills fields (i.e. bosons), where they are called Faddeev-Popov determinants and represent ghost fields.
If I remember correctly, the latter appear in the "numerator" of the path integrand, while the "regular" fermion determinants appear in the denominator. Hence they cannot be interpreted as an integral over a hypersurface of the configurations (unlike the gauge-fixed Yang-Mills fields, which are integrated over the hypersurface of the configurations that satisfy the chosen gauge condition).

- 7,462