2

I'm trying to understand fermion fields with the Feynman integral. Is there an explicit matrix representation of the Grassmann numbers used in the field integral? Is there a Grassmann-valued measure that results in the Berezin integral? In my book, they just introduce the algebraic relations $ab = -ba$ with no construction of $a$ or $b$, and I'm having trouble visualizing it.

Qmechanic
  • 201,751

2 Answers2

2

You are not alone in this. I tend to regard the Grassmann integral as tool for combinatorics, but if you want a deeper view and a discussion of analytic subtleties you might like to read Martin R. Zirnbauer, Riemannian symmetric superspaces and their origin in random-matrix theory, J. Math. Phys.\ 37 (1996) 4986; arXiv:math-ph/9808012.

mike stone
  • 52,996
0

Grassmann variables are just a convenient way of representing determinants in path integrals. Hence the anti-commutativity. There is some similarity with Slater determinants, which represent fermions in multi-particle quantum mechanics.

What is kind of strange, is that determinants also appear in gauge-fixed path integrals of Yang-Mills fields (i.e. bosons), where they are called Faddeev-Popov determinants and represent ghost fields.

If I remember correctly, the latter appear in the "numerator" of the path integrand, while the "regular" fermion determinants appear in the denominator. Hence they cannot be interpreted as an integral over a hypersurface of the configurations (unlike the gauge-fixed Yang-Mills fields, which are integrated over the hypersurface of the configurations that satisfy the chosen gauge condition).

oliver
  • 7,462