2

Would the 2 orbiting black holes emit gravitational waves even if they are moving at a constant speed in orbits? Here, can we consider the changing direction of black holes in their orbits as acceleration that can be a cause of gravitational waves?

Qmechanic
  • 201,751
Rusics
  • 41
  • 2
    Related: https://physics.stackexchange.com/q/293280/123208 – PM 2Ring Jun 11 '21 at 15:27
  • emision of gravitational waves from bodies locked in a mutual orbit is a well studied topic. Did you search for an answer before posting a question? If you did and couldn't find an answer, that's fine. If not, in future do try to search say in Google, if that's available, or within stack exchange itself. Also note that as you type a question, a list of similar questions appears - it may sometimes contain closely matching questions. Stay curious and Welcome to Physics SE! – lineage Jun 13 '21 at 10:52

2 Answers2

5

The basic answer is yes, the changing velocity vector is an acceleration which in turn leads to an accelerating mass quadrupole moment and the emission of gravitational waves.

However, the scenario you propose is physically inconsistent. If the speed of the black holes were to remain absolutely constant, then their separation and orbital energy couldn't change, which is inconsistent with gravitational wave emission, since these must remove energy from the system.

However, as a thought experiment, we could arrange for some mechanism to keep the black hole speed constant by supplying energy to the system. We would find that this energy supply would be that needed to balance the gravitational wave losses.

The physically consistent solution is that gravitational waves take away energy, the orbit shrinks and the speed of the black holes increases. This leads to a greater gravitational wave loss, the inspiral and ultimately the merger of the black holes.

ProfRob
  • 130,455
0

Gravitational waves behave, at least superficially, in a similar manner to "classical" electromagnetic waves: meaning that if you have a charged particle (so in the case of gravitation: a particle with mass) and that particle is performing an accelerated, undulatory motion, then you can rest assure that waves would be emitted, no matter the value or constancy of the angular velocity.

Note also that it's not strictly necessary to have two bodies orbiting each other to get gravitational waves, as we were saying: it's sufficient to have a single body under accelerated, let's say circular, motion. But of course since gravity is so weak compared to the other interactions it's necessary to deal with really massive bodies (black holes, neutron stars) to get observable gravitational waves; and in practice the only way to get a body as massive as a black hole to move into a circular motion is to have it orbiting another one of its kind.

Noumeno
  • 4,474
  • Your last paragraph isn't quite right. A black hole can be in a binary system with a neutron star or normal star. In fact, most stellar mass black hole candidates are in binary systems with normal stars, accreting material from their companion. It's difficult to detect a binary pair of black holes if they aren't accreting stray matter, you need to detect them via gravitational waves or gravitational lensing. Please see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nearest_black_holes – PM 2Ring Jun 13 '21 at 11:40