Consider the position wavefunction $|Ψ\rangle$, which can be written as a linear combination of the eigenstates $|Ψ_n\rangle$ of the position operator:
$$|Ψ\rangle = c_1|Ψ_1\rangle + c_2|Ψ_2\rangle + ... c_n|Ψ_n\rangle + ... $$
(where the $c_n$ are the probability amplitudes, according to Born's rule).
If we perform the measurement of the position through the position operator $\hat{x}$, the wavefunction collapses to only one of these eigenstates $|Ψ_n\rangle$, and the operator's equation yields an eigenvalue which corresponds to the result of the measurement, i.e. the position of the wavefunction:
$$\hat{x}|Ψ_n\rangle = x_n|Ψ_n\rangle. $$
But how is it possible that particle is exactly at $x_n$, as this equation is saying? $|Ψ\rangle$ has collapsed and now it's only $|Ψ_n\rangle$, and $|Ψ_n\rangle$ is located at position $x_n$ according to the operator's equation. Heisenberg's uncertainty principle clearly states that a particle can't be measured to be located in a point (aka, in only one location) since that would imply maximum certainty on $x_n$, so $\Delta x=0$. From the principle:
$$\Delta x \Delta p \geq \frac{h}{4\pi}. $$
If we plug in $\Delta x=0$, the inequality is not satisfied. This would have been avoided if the wavefunction collapsed to a superposition of more than one eigenstate.