0

Once one has learned of Electromagnetic force, they see that the amount of force experienced by particle given a field is proportional to the particles electric charge.

Similar situation the gravitational case where one sees that the gravitational force experienced by a particle is proportional to its mass.

But, if one sees the other side of the equation they see $ma$ for both cases, and further this $m$ is the exact same as the mass controlling size of gravitational force. Is there any deep reason why one side of Newton's second law ended up being $ma$ instead of say $qa $? ($ q$ is charge)

It seems strange to me because we say gravity and electromagnetism are both fundamental forces but the 'factor' for gravity controls the actual acceleration caused on any particle by any type of force. Essentially, I am confused why mass seems to be more fundamental to calculating acceleration than charge.

2 Answers2

1

Newton's second law states that the force experienced by a body is vectorially equal to the rate of change of its momentum which is defined as mv. For a fixed mass, this rate reduces to the familiar form of F=ma. This explains the presence of mass on the r.h.s. of the equation. The most fundamental mechanical law (Newton's second law) relates any force with momentum which is defined using mass. The left hand side of the equation is the definition of force for the specific system and so it takes on different forms - using charge for electrostatic, current for magnetostatic, mass for gravitational and so on. So while the l.h.s. is defining the nature of the force acting on your chosen system, the r.h.s. is defining the standard mechanical effect of any force, which is to produce acceleration in an object of fixed mass. Does this answer your question?

0

Mass requires input of energy to accelerate...Newton's second law is a description of the changes that a force can produce on the motion of a body, not what the body adheres to on the substantive force