By considering the variation of a lagrangian which has no explicit space time dependence under an arbitrary spacetime translation, $a^{\mu}$ I've seen that we can express the variation in the lagrangian as $$\delta \mathcal{L}=a^{\nu}\partial_{\mu}\mathcal{L}$$$$=a^{\mu}\partial_{\mu}(\delta^{\nu}_{\mu}\mathcal{L})$$$$=a^{\mu}\partial_{\mu}J^{\nu}_{\mu}$$. Using Noether's theorem we can therefore find the four conserved Noether currents in the form of the stress energy tensor: $$T^{\nu}_{\mu}=\frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial(\partial_{\nu}\phi)}\partial_{\mu}\phi-J^{\nu}_{\mu}$$ I'm comfortable up to this point, however I don't understand: (a) why we can raise the index to give: $$T^{\mu\nu}=\frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial(\partial_{\nu}\phi)}\partial^{\mu}\phi-g^{\mu\nu}\mathcal{L}$$ and (b) this tensor isn't obviously symmetric to me.
Asked
Active
Viewed 119 times
2

Qmechanic
- 201,751

Adrien Amour
- 901
-
3The canonical stress-energy tensor ( https://physics.stackexchange.com/q/194870/226902 ) is typically neither symmetric nor gauge-invariant, and some work is needed to “repair” it (e.g. Belinfante stress-energy tensor). See "Stress-Energy-Momentum Tensors and the Belinfante-Rosenfeld Formula" ( https://www.cds.caltech.edu/~marsden/bib/1992/05-GoMa1992/GoMa1992.pdf ) and https://physics.stackexchange.com/q/56067/226902 https://physics.stackexchange.com/q/119838/226902 – Quillo May 31 '22 at 15:34
-
3The indices in your $\delta\mathcal{L}$ calculation don't make sense. – J.G. May 31 '22 at 16:03