0

I found the following paper online: http://www2.mathematik.hu-berlin.de/publ/pre/2013/P-2014-01.pdf. I also attach a screenshot of the paragraph I am confused by (page 63-64).

What is meant by the statement that when renormalizing the effective action flows in the theory space? I am especially confused why the effective action is expanded in operators which where not part of my theory before. E.g. in the paper $\lambda \phi^4$ is renormalized but suddenly the effective action has terms $\propto \phi^n $.

In my understand of renormalization the effective action $\Gamma(\phi)$ is the Legendre transformed of \begin{equation} W(J)=\int [d \phi] e^{-S_{bare}(\phi)-S_{ct}(\phi)+\phi J} \end{equation} where the countqerterms are are just terms $\propto \frac{1}{\epsilon^n}$ in dimensional regularization ensuring that each Feynman diagram is finite. In some sense they are just constants. So how do they give rise to new operators in $\Gamma( \phi)$.

enter image description here

Qmechanic
  • 201,751
NicAG
  • 498
  • Minor comment to the post (v2): Please consider to mention explicitly author, title, etc. of link, so it is possible to reconstruct link in case of link rot. – Qmechanic Jul 16 '22 at 14:13
  • [My answer to "Generating nonlinearities in renormalization group"][1] has a $0d$ example that may be instructive. ["Proof that Wilsonian renormalization only generates terms consistent with the symmetry of the action"][2] is also relevant. [1]: https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/633610/generating-nonlinearities-in-renormalization-group/633642#633642 [2]: https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/665144/proof-that-wilsonian-renormalization-only-generates-terms-consistent-with-the-sy?rq=1 – bbrink Jul 16 '22 at 21:20
  • The missing piece of the connection to this question would be the relationship between the Wilsonian effective action and the 1PI effective action, which I believe are related by a Legendre transform. – bbrink Jul 16 '22 at 21:21

0 Answers0