Some time ago, just starting out at a photographic company, I asked why essentially all media depictions of rainbows look fake. A color-theory expert there asked how saturated I thought rainbow colors might be. I guessed around 50%. He laughed, told me to sign up for the company's introduction-to-reprography seminar, and said that normal printing techniques would strain achieve that - needed Kodachrome, a good screen and a dark room to show anything so dramatic. He suggested that real rainbows only look colorful in context, with most of the apparent contrast emerging in brain rather than actual retinal signal; that even the most impressive rainbows, with dark-cloud backgrounds, rarely have a peak chroma/saturation above about 5%.
I have since seen a few articles on the subject, e.g. How pure are the colors of the rainbow?. But I haven't yet found published results of narrow-angle, calibrated photometry on rainbows in either optimal-contrast or average viewing conditions.
Can someone here please point to such an article, preferably not behind a JSTOR-type paywall?
I'm really seeking actual color saturation or chrminance values, which can then easily be compared to, for example, Web colors.
– cTen Aug 12 '22 at 17:09