5

In this article, the author tried to explain that, Einstein's theory may not valid because he says "photon can decay because it may have minute amount of mass". I'm totally in a conundrum state that how to take this article? Anyone can explain a bit please.

Waffle's Crazy Peanut
  • 9,088
Raisa
  • 651
  • 1
    The current text of this questions is deeply misleading. The article assumes the correctness of relativity which investigating a theory in which the photon has mass. – dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten Aug 04 '13 at 18:58
  • 1
    Dear Raisa - just scanning the text, I can't find mention of relativity. I presume then you mean that a photon mass would imply variable lightspeed, thus overturning SR and GR. Not so. $c$ is simply the speed of a massless particle - whether or not light has mass has no impact on relativity - there are still very basic symmetry reasons for SR that have nothing to do with light - see a description of relativity without consideration of light of mine. – Selene Routley Aug 04 '13 at 22:29

1 Answers1

7

You can postulate the existence of a photon mass and then use experiments to put an upper bound on it. The mass-modified Lagrangian is called the Proca Lagrangian (see Jackson's Classical Electrodynamics, second edition page 597). In the static case you get a Yukawa type potential. If the photon has nonzero mass, then it should decay. Of course, this would change a lot of what we think we know, but the limits on the mass are very small. Here is a nice overview of mass limits on the photon and graviton. http://arxiv.org/abs/0809.1003

Incidentally, some people like a symmetric form of Maxwell that includes a magnetic "charge density" (monopole). Similar efforts can put bounds on the existance of monopoles.