1

Although I have asked a similar question here, here, I find that I don't totally understand it, so I arrange my new ideas to this post.

Begin with Berezin integral: $$\left(\prod_i \int d \theta_i^* d \theta_i\right) e^{-\theta_i^* B_{i j} \theta_j}=\operatorname{det} B \tag{9.69}. $$

Now I want to calculate: $$\int \mathcal{D} \bar{\psi} \mathcal{D} \psi \exp \left[i \int d^4 x \bar{\psi}(i \not \partial-m) \psi\right], \tag{A}$$ the book said that $A=\text{det}(i\not\partial-m)$, but that's not clear for me.

First, we need to note that the indices $i,j$ in (9.69) is the discretization of all space time, and $i$, $j$ are independent. But now our situation is $\bar{\psi}(x)(i \not \partial-m)_x \psi(x)$, we only have one set of space time points (in Hilbert space), so I want to expand operator $(i\not\partial-m)_x$ in matrix representation.

Then, if we define the Green function of $(i\not\partial-m)_x$: $$(i\not\partial-m)_x S_F(x-y)=i\delta^4(x-y), \tag{B}$$ we can represent (see here) $$(i\not\partial-m)_x \psi(x)=\int d^4 y (-i S_F(x-y)^{-1})\psi(y), \tag{C} $$ Now we can write A as: $$ \begin{aligned} A&=\int \mathcal{D} \bar{\psi} \mathcal{D} \psi \exp \left[i \int d^4 x d^4 y\bar{\psi}(x)[-i S_F(x-y)^{-1}] \psi(y)\right]\\ & = \Pi_i \int d\bar{\psi}_i d\psi_i \exp \left[- \bar{\psi}_i[- S_F(x-y)^{-1}]_{ij} \psi_j\right], \end{aligned} \tag{D}$$ where in the second line we use spacetime discretization, and $i$, $j$ sum separately inside the exponent.

So from D and (9.69), it seems that $$\int \mathcal{D} \bar{\psi} \mathcal{D} \psi \exp \left[i \int d^4 x \bar{\psi}(i \not \partial-m) \psi\right]=\text{det}(- S_F(x-y)^{-1}). \tag{E}$$

So would $$\text{det}(- S_F(x-y)^{-1})=\text{det}(i\not\partial-m)~?\tag{F}$$ Or where is my problem?

Qmechanic
  • 201,751
Daren
  • 1,401
  • 2
    If you diagonalize $(9.69)$, you will have a sum of the form $\sum_i \theta_i b_i \theta_i$. But the formula given is still valid! Sometimes in the literature, you will see a functional determinant written like $\det (D\delta(x-y))$. In fact, you can replace $\overline{\psi} (i \not \partial -m) \psi$ by $\int d^4y\overline{\psi}(x) (i \not \partial -m) \psi(y) \delta(x-y)$, and you recover two indices. I hope it helped a bit.. – Jeanbaptiste Roux Nov 21 '22 at 15:58
  • @JeanbaptisteRoux Thanks, that's helpful! – Daren Nov 22 '22 at 01:25

1 Answers1

1

It seems OP's problem is not really about Grassmann variables and spinors per se, but rather how to identify the matrix entries$^1$ $$M(x,y)~=~(-i)(i \not\partial-m)\delta^4(x-y)\tag{i}$$ of an infinite-dimensional matrix $$M(x,y)_{x,y\in\mathbb{R}^4}\tag{ii}$$ in the functional determinant eq. (A). Here the spacetime coordinates $x$ and $y$ are the continuous indices of the infinite-dimensional matrix.

So one should strictly speaking write the functional determinant as $$\det \left(M(x,y)_{x,y\in\mathbb{R}^4}\right).\tag{iii}$$ Eq. (iii) should be compared to the book's (conceptionally confusing, but commonly used) shorthand notation, where the 4D Dirac delta distribution is implicitly implied.

--

$^1$ The factor $(-i)$ in eq. (i) is determined by comparing eqs. (9.69) & (A).

Qmechanic
  • 201,751
  • Thank you very much for your answer, may I add a comment? So strictly speaking, according to (9.69) in my post, so we need to $-i$ before $M(x,y)$ that you defined. Would this right? Is this $-i$ also implicitly implied? – Daren Nov 27 '22 at 11:04
  • 1
    Ups. Right. Corrected. – Qmechanic Nov 27 '22 at 11:31