2

Note: I had an overlong post which I was advised to break into pieces - here is my first, most basic question. Next question is here.

I'm trying to understand how the electric one-form symmetry acts in 4d Maxwell theory on a manifold without boundary, and then what it means to try to gauge it. SE answers I've already read include 1, 3, 4 and 5, but I wasn't able to get a complete picture.

What is the precise action of the global one-form symmetry on the operators, vs a possibly gauged version?

Here is my current understanding.

The Maxwell action is

$$ S_0 = \int \frac{1}{2g^2} F\wedge \star F $$ with $F = dA$ (locally).

We can see that this action is totally invariant under $A \rightarrow A + \lambda$, if $d \lambda = 0$. $\lambda = d\omega$ is of course the 0-form gauge symmetry.

While $S_0$ is invariant, the shift in $A$ will be detected by Wilson lines $$ W_n[C] = e^{i n \oint A} \rightarrow e^{in \oint \lambda} W_n[C]. $$

This SE answer shows that the phase picked up is topological in the sense that it depends only on the homology class of $C$, since if $C \sqcup (-C') = \partial \Sigma$ then $$ \int_C \lambda - \int_{C'} \lambda = \int_{\Sigma} d\lambda = 0. $$ Just as global 0-form symmetries involve shifting a field by a constant, i.e a 0-dimensional operator which doesn't change when you move around the connected manifold, so does a 1-form global symmetry involve shifting a field by a 1-dimensional operator that doesn't depend on how you smoothly deform it. Crucially this requires $d\lambda=0$.

On the other hand, consider shifting by some $\lambda$ such that $d\lambda \neq 0$. Then $$ \Delta S_0 = \frac{1}{g^2} \int \star F \wedge d \lambda = \frac{1}{g^2} \int d\star F \wedge \lambda = 0 $$ by virtue of the equation of motion for $A$. (This is up to some $d\lambda \wedge \star d\lambda$ term we are allowed to absorb.).

Elsewhere $\lambda$ is referred to as a flat connection, but a field is still said to shift by $d\lambda$.

$\color{orange}{\textbf{THE QUESTION}}$

Does the global symmetry action have $d\lambda = 0$ (as is held to be the case in this answer) or not? If not, what equations does $\lambda$ have to obey, and what changes about these equations when we consider trying to gauge the symmetry?

Compare this to the 0-form case where we start with a shift by a constant $\alpha$, then, when we gauge, consider the more general $\alpha(x)$.

Qmechanic
  • 201,751
quixot
  • 133

1 Answers1

2

The answer is essentially what @ACuriousMind pointed out in a comment (which I will quote here, because comments are intended to be temporary)

if you use the equations of motion you're not demonstrating a symmetry. $δS=0$ under all possible infinitesimal variations is the definition of a solution of the equations of motion, so if you have to use the equation of motions to arrive at $δS=0$, you're not showing anything interesting - symmetries have to be off-shell, see also this.

Another way to see this, which is inherently a QFT statement is through the path integral. $\newcommand{\d}{\mathrm{d}}\newcommand{\D}{\mathrm{D}}$Namely, the gauge fields are dummy integration variables, i.e. $$\int\D a \exp(-S[a]) = \int\D a' \exp(-S[a']).\tag{1}$$

But now, take $S[a]$ to be the Maxwell action$1$ $$S[a]=\frac{1}{2g^2}\Vert f\Vert^2,$$ and take $a' = a+\lambda$, where $\lambda$ is allowed to have some curvature. You can most easily see that $\D a' = \D a$ and $$S[a'] = \frac{1}{2g^2}\left(\Vert f\Vert^2 + 2\left<f,\d \lambda\right> + \Vert\d \lambda\Vert^2\right)$$ Then (1) says that $$\int\D a \exp(-S[a]) = \int\D a \exp\!\left(-S[a]+\frac{1}{g^2}\left<f,\d \lambda\right> + \frac{1}{2g^2}\Vert\d \lambda\Vert^2\right),$$ which is true if and only if $\d\lambda = 0$.

Therefore only shifts by flat connections give a symmetry of Maxwell theory.


1 where $\Vert\bullet\Vert^2$ comes from the usual inner-product $\left<\bullet,\circ\right>:=\int \bullet\wedge\star\circ$

  • Thanks for this response, that's very clear. Followup questions are
    1. If we gauge the symmetry, are we considering non-flat $\lambda$?
    2. Are there subtleties involved in the fact that the one-form electric current is only conserved when $A$ is on-shell?
    – quixot Dec 01 '22 at 14:01
  • 1
    @quixot for 1. I believe that's one of the main topics in your other question, which I'll answer when/if I have the time, unless someone else answers it sufficiently before I manage to do so. Short answer is yes. I don't understand what you mean by 2. Do you mean when $\lambda$ is not flat? This just tells you that there isn't a global symmetry for non-flat $\lambda$. – ɪdɪət strəʊlə Dec 01 '22 at 14:30
  • I just mean that $dJ_e=d\star F = 0$ is the equation of motion for $A$. – quixot Dec 01 '22 at 14:37
  • 1
    Would it be fair to say the following: symmetries must have $\delta S = 0$ off-shell, but their associated current is only conserved on-shell? – quixot Dec 01 '22 at 16:01
  • 1
    @quixot, yes, that is correct – ɪdɪət strəʊlə Dec 01 '22 at 21:33
  • Brilliant, thanks! – quixot Dec 01 '22 at 21:54