Why do groups of atoms decay at predictable rates even though a single atom’s decay point is completely unpredictable? I’m having trouble wrapping my head around this.
From my reading, it seems that the law of large numbers can explain this. For example, even though it is unknown where a particular coin will land, we can say with reasonable certainty that when tossing tons of coins, about half will land on heads and the other half tails.
But in the case of a coin, there seems to be physical reasons explaining why about half will land on tails and heads. For starters, the coin is balanced on each side and given the rest of our knowledge about nature, there is no reason to prefer one side over the other given how objects behave when thrown in the air.
If one had never seen or tossed a coin before, assuming there was nothing biasing one side, one could still guess that about half the times you land it, it will land on heads. But in the case of atoms, one cannot seem to predict this. We observe frequencies of atoms decaying and then after the fact determine their probabilities of decay.
The question, then, is twofold. First, why is the decay rate or half life of a particular group of atoms X instead of Y? What influences this if we’ve found (and apparently proved) no possible local influence of decay on a single atom?
Second, why is there a constant decay rate for these groups of atoms in the first place? Why not complete and utter chaos (I.e. pure chaos or complete indeterminism)?
That may be one of the standard meanings of random in ordinary language.
But in science, random has a more precise meaning drawn from the theory of probability and statistics. In particular, to say that an event (e.g. the measured outcome of an experiment) behaves randomly means that there is a certain probability distribution on the outcomes of that event (e.g. the set of possible values of the measurement).
– Lee Mosher Oct 16 '23 at 18:10