-1

I'm confused about what "a Grassmann-odd number" really means and how does it apply to fermions.

In some text, it says that "if $\varepsilon \eta+\eta \varepsilon =0 $, then $\varepsilon $ and $\eta$ are Grassmann-odd numbers.

And in wiki, the Grassmann algebra are those whose generators satisfy $$\theta_1\theta_2+\theta_2\theta_1=0$$ and fermion space is one of the Grassmann algebras.

So, following these definitions, a fermion field is a Grassmann-odd number because $$\{\psi_\alpha,\psi_\beta\}=0$$ so is its conjugate. But $$\{\psi_\alpha,\psi^\dagger_\beta\}=\hbar\delta_{\alpha \beta}.$$ So why don't $\psi_\alpha$ and $\psi^\dagger_\beta$ anticommute if they are all Grassmann-odd number?

I suppose that if they are not belonging to the same Grassmann algebra. But if so, when the essay says "$\epsilon$ is a Grassmann-odd number" (e.g.Chapter II of an essay about supersymmetry), what does it mean?

Qmechanic
  • 201,751
Errorbar
  • 199
  • 1
    You are confusing numbers with operators. The operators ${\hat \psi}\alpha$ satisfy ${ {\hat \psi}\alpha , {\hat \psi}\beta^\dagger } = \delta{\alpha\beta}$. The Grassmannian numbers $\psi_\alpha$ anti-commute. – Prahar Mar 21 '24 at 14:29
  • Related: https://physics.stackexchange.com/q/232382/2451 and links therein. – Qmechanic Mar 22 '24 at 00:01
  • @Qmechanic But the relationship for classical ${\psi_\alpha,\psi^\dagger_\beta}$ in your answer seems not consistent with the answer below this question. What have I missed? – Errorbar Mar 22 '24 at 04:35
  • Be aware that the notation ${\cdot,\cdot}$ denotes an anticommutator for some authors while a super-Poisson bracket for others. – Qmechanic Mar 22 '24 at 05:08

1 Answers1

4

It is wrong to claim that:

$$\{\psi_\alpha,\psi^\dagger_\beta\}=\delta_{\alpha \beta}$$

since Grassmann odd numbers should always anticommute with each other: $$\{\psi_\alpha,\psi^\dagger_\beta\}=0$$ Only after you promote (via quantization) the classical Grassmann odd numbers $\psi_\alpha$, $\psi^\dagger_\beta$ to the quantum fermionic operators $\Psi_\alpha$, $\Psi^\dagger_\beta$ then you have $$\{\Psi_\alpha,\Psi^\dagger_\beta\}=\delta_{\alpha \beta}$$ where $\Psi_\alpha$ and $\Psi^\dagger_\beta$ are NOT Grassmann odd numbers any more.

MadMax
  • 3,737
  • I haven't got it. I don't know how to verify if an operator is quantum. Does it mean second quantization? And if the first two relationships are remain satisfied for the quantum operatots, doesn't it mean they are still Grassmann numbers (stasfying anticommute relationship). – Errorbar Mar 21 '24 at 14:25
  • "How to verify if an operator is quantum": when they don't (anti-)commute, such as ${\Psi_\alpha,\Psi^\dagger_\beta}=\delta_{\alpha \beta}$. – MadMax Mar 21 '24 at 14:28