9

I have heard about the following result: for each finite simple non-abelian group S and each natural number r2 there exists a number n=n(r,S) such that the power Sn is r-generator but Sn+1 is not r-generator. What is known about the numbers n(r,S)? Could someone give me references to this, please?

(I have posted this already on mathstackexchange.com, but did not get a response.)

Edit: This question is in a sense a converse to Bounding from below the cardinality of a set of generators of the n-fold cartesian product of a finite group. There it is basically asked for a given (arbitrary, finite) group G and a given number n, how small can a generating set for Gn possibly (not) be. In my question the input parameters were a finite simple group S and a number r2 and the question was how big a number n can possibly be so that r elements are sufficient to generate the power Sn. Also I was interested in how this number (the biggest such n) is actually computed in concrete examples (or whatever is known about the computation of these numbers).

Basically I wanted to know, given a finite simple non-abelian group S and a number r, the product of how many copies of S do I need to take to get the r-generated free object in the formation generated by S.

@Editors/moderators: please feel free to delete the question if it is inappropriate.

  • 1
    There are some references in the answers to the earlier question, but if you are interested in some exact computations, in a paper by myself and Murray Macbeath, "Certain maximal characteristic subgroups of the free group of rank 2", COMMUNICATIONS IN ALGEBRA, 25(4), 1047- 1077 (1997), we compute n(2,S) with S=PSL(2,q) for small q. For example with q=5,31,125, n(2,S) is respectively 19, 7135, 161420. – Derek Holt Nov 22 '14 at 04:04
  • Thanks for this reference and also for the one pointing to Wiegold's paper in your answer to an earlier question! – user 59363 Nov 23 '14 at 18:35
  • see http://mathoverflow.net/questions/198785/what-is-the-growth-of-the-rank-of-a-power-of-a-finite-simple-group – Andreas Thom Mar 02 '15 at 08:03

2 Answers2

7

See Collins's thesis, Theorem 2.22, page 21.

Theorem 2.22. Let S be a nonabelian simple group and hn1(S)<khn(S). Then r(Sk)=n.

Here, r(G) is the minimal number of generators of G and hn(G) is the reduced Euler function i.e. the number of generator sequences of length n of G divided by |Aut G|.

  • 1
    But what is known about the computation of the numbers hr(S), for given S and r? – user 59363 Nov 23 '14 at 19:45
  • 1
    The automorphism groups of finite simple groups are well known. So, we have to calculate the (non-reduced) Euler function ϕn(G) (ie. the number of generating n-tuples). In Section 1.1, Collins describes a technique of such calculations that allowed Hall (in 1936) to calculate, e.g., ϕ2(A5)=19120 (ie. h2(A5)=19). – Anton Klyachko Nov 23 '14 at 21:07
  • Thanks for the reference! It contains several other things which are also intersting for me. – user 59363 Nov 25 '14 at 20:44
  • Oh, I see: http://mathoverflow.net/a/53162/24165 – Anton Klyachko Nov 27 '14 at 10:42
3

I have no reference for this problem, but let's at least write down the trivial bounds.

Let s1,srSn and suppose n>|S|r. Associate to each index i the element (πi(s1),,πi(sr))Sr, where πi:SnS is the projection onto the ith factor. Since n>|S|r there are distinct indices i and j such that πi(sk)=πj(sk) for each k. But this implies that πi×πj maps s1,,sr into the diagonal subgroup of S×S, so s1,,sr do not generate Sn.

Next we claim that if Sn can be generated with r elements then Sn+1 can be generated with r+1 elements. Indeed take r generators s1,,sr of Sn and consider the elements (s1,π1(s1)),,(sr,π1(sr)),(e,x)Sn×S. Here x is any nonidentity element of S. By conjugating the last element of this list by the first r elements you see that the elements together generate 1×S by simplicity, so indeed they generate Sn+1.

Finally recall that every finite simple group is 2-generated. Thus the minimal number of generators of Sn starts at 2 and climbs to infinity never rising more than 1 step at a time, so your function n(r,S) is well defined, and the things we've said so far demonstrate the bounds r1n(r,S)|S|r.

It seems to me that n(3,S) should tend to infinity with |S|, but I don't see how to prove that right now.

  • Thanks a lot for your effort. The trivial upper bound can be even chosen to be at most |S|r1: the r-generator free object F in the variety generated by S is sitting inside S|S|r (for universal algebraic reasons) and each r-generator power of S must be a quotient of F --- it must be a proper quotient since F has also solvable quotients, for example, so they cannot be isomorphic. I was more interested in results of the kind: for which (r,S) has the number n(r,S) been computed? (E.g. n(2,A5)=19, but again I have no reference for this.) – user 59363 Nov 21 '14 at 21:02