1

I'm facing a problem which states the following:

Suppose that it is discovered that Newton's law of gravitation is incorrect and that the force $F$ on test particle of mass $m$ due to a body of mass $M$ has an additional term that does not depend on $M$, as follows:

$$F = - \frac{GmM}{r^2} + \frac{A m r}{3}$$

Where $A$ is a positive constant. Assuming that Newton's sphere theorem continues to hold, derive the appropriate form fo the Friedmann equations in this case.

How I proceeded

Consider the motion of a point like particle of mass $m$ located on the surface of a sphere of homogeneous density $\rho$ and radius $R = a r$. The acceleration this particle is subjected is

$$\ddot{R} = r \ddot{a} = \frac{-GM}{r^2} + \frac{AR}{3} = -\frac{G}{R^2}\left(\frac{4}{3}\pi R^3 \rho\right) + \frac{AR}{3} = -\frac{4}{3}\pi G\rho R + \frac{AR}{3}$$

Hence

$$\ddot{R} = r\ddot{a} = \frac{1}{3}\left[A - 4\pi\rho G\right]ra$$

$$3\frac{\ddot{a}}{\dot{a}} = A - 4\pi\rho G$$

Adding the pressure term and arranging:

$$3\frac{\ddot{a}}{\dot{a}} = A - 4\pi\rho G(\rho + 3P)$$

Is this correct?

Thank you so much!

Les Adieux
  • 3,705

1 Answers1

3

If we want to derive the Friedmann Equation by using Newtonian Mechanics we can always use the Energy of the system.

$$F=ma=-k/R^2+AmR/3$$

And the potential energy related to this force would be, $$U=-\int Fdr$$ $$U=-\int(\frac{-MmG}{R^2}+\frac{AmR} {3})dr$$ $$U=-\frac {MmG} {R}-\frac {AmR^2} {6}$$

Total energy of the particle of mass m will be, $$E=T+U$$ $$E=\frac {mV^2} {2}-\frac {MmG} {R}-\frac {AmR^2} {6}$$

Multiplying both side with $\frac {2} {mR^2}$

$$\frac {2E} {mR^2} = \frac {V^2} {R^2}-\frac {2MG} {R^3}-\frac {A} {3}$$

but $V=\dot{R}=\dot{a}(t)r$ and we know that $R=a(t)r$ hence

$$\frac {2E} {mR^2} = \frac {\dot{a}(t)^2} {a(t)^2}-\frac {2MG} {R^3}-\frac {A} {3}$$

finally writing

$$\frac {\dot{a}(t)^2} {a(t)^2}=\frac {8\pi G\rho} {3}+\frac {A} {3}+\frac {2E} {ma(t)^2r^2}$$

if we wanted to write in relativistic form we would have,$2E/mr^2=-\kappa c^2/R^2$ and energy density $\epsilon=\rho c^2$ or $\rho=\epsilon /c^2$ where $\rho$ is the matter density.

so we have,

$$\frac {\dot{a}(t)^2} {a(t)^2}=\frac {8\pi G} {3c^2}\epsilon(t)+\frac {A} {3}-\frac {\kappa c^2} {a(t)^2R^2}$$

For the acceleration, from $$F=ma=m\ddot{R}=-k/R^2+AmR/3$$

$$\ddot{R}=-MG/R^2+AR/3$$ $$\frac {\ddot{R}} {R} =-MG/R^3+A/3$$

or $$\frac {\ddot{a}(t)} {a(t)}= -\frac {4\pi G\rho} {3} + \frac {A} {3}$$

In general the acceleration equation is written as $$\frac {\ddot{a}(t)} {a(t)}= -\frac {4\pi G}{3c^2}(\epsilon+3P)$$

But the equation of state for matter is $P=w\epsilon=0$ since $w=0$ for matter hence we have $$\frac {\ddot{a}(t)} {a(t)}= -\frac {4\pi G}{3c^2}(\epsilon) + \frac {A} {3}$$ (Since we have an additional term, our equation is a bit different)

or in terms of matter density,

$$\frac {\ddot{a}(t)} {a(t)}= -\frac {4\pi G\rho} {3} + \frac {A} {3}$$

Which is exactly what we derived using the $F=ma$

seVenVo1d
  • 3,112
  • 14
  • 32
  • More or less. I want to find Friedmann equations for that model. Shalln't we take in consideration also the "pressure term"? – Les Adieux Jan 06 '19 at 15:06
  • 1
    Sorry, In this case its better to go from the Energy, I assumed you wanted to derive the acceleration equation. We do not need to consider the pressure term for matter, since pressure would be zero. And the question do not asks about the radiation or for other terms. I ll edit my answer according to that. – seVenVo1d Jan 06 '19 at 15:19
  • 1
    I did the editing. Hope this helps you better – seVenVo1d Jan 06 '19 at 15:47
  • 1
    I did a bit more editing :) – seVenVo1d Jan 06 '19 at 16:07
  • Thank you so much!! Seems like, beside $P = 0$, we have a difference in signs. I have probably messed up with something. Thank you again! – Les Adieux Jan 06 '19 at 16:35
  • Ins't there a minus sign missing? It all starts when $F = ma = m\dot{R} = -k/R^2$ and so on... in the following line, the minus is missing... or not? – Les Adieux Jan 06 '19 at 16:40
  • In which equation ? – seVenVo1d Jan 06 '19 at 16:59
  • 1
    $\ddot{R} = \ldots$ after you derived the acceleration from Newton's law. A minus sign is missing? – Les Adieux Jan 06 '19 at 17:00