3

Can someone provide a derivation of the Biot-Savart law for electromagnetic induction? To be clear, $$ d\vec{B}~=~\frac{\mu_0}{4\pi}\frac{I d\vec{\ell}\times \vec{r}}{r^3}. $$

Is there a simple way to compute the magnetic field at a point between two Helmholtz coils, if the radii of the coils are the same and the current through each coil is the same?

Qmechanic
  • 201,751

2 Answers2

3

In the static case you can solve Maxwell equations using a vector potential via the poisson equatuion for the magnetic potential.

$\Delta \vec A(\vec r)=-\mu_0 \vec J(\vec r)$

Using the Greens function for the Laplace operator yields the solution of this differential equation.

$\vec A(\vec r)=\frac{\mu_0}{4 \pi}\int d^3r' \frac{\vec J(\vec r')}{|{\vec r-\vec r'}|}$

Now we can calculate the B field via $\vec B = \vec\nabla \times \vec A$ and use the identity $\vec\nabla\times(\phi\vec A)=\phi(\vec\nabla\times(\vec A))-\vec A\times\vec\nabla\phi $. Additionally we have to calculate the gradient of the scalar function 1/|(r-r')|. This gives the Bio Savart law.

Noldig
  • 1,459
  • 1
    What is '$rot$'? Furthermore, I am not convinced that you can do what you have stated. I want to see the entire thing! – MoonKnight May 16 '13 at 08:05
  • rot is the german word of curl, I'm sorry for that. Which point is not clear or what do you think I can not do? – Noldig May 16 '13 at 08:16
  • 1
    I don't see how you can derive the full expression from what you have said... – MoonKnight May 16 '13 at 08:23
  • @Killercam: you can get to the Biot-Savart law from Noldig's answer for the vector potential by using explicitely cartesian coordinates and vector basis. – gatsu May 16 '13 at 09:14
0

It is an experimental law not derivable from other more basic laws

richard
  • 4,194
  • 3
    I think this is wrong. You can derive it directly from Maxwell equations, which are more fundamental from my point of view. – Noldig May 16 '13 at 07:16
  • 3
    And how do you think Maxwell equations have been obtained? I think from Coulomb and Biot-Savart laws! – richard May 16 '13 at 08:29
  • 3
    ok, historically you are correct. Let's say they follow from each other, or they are consistent. – Noldig May 16 '13 at 08:50
  • 2
    OK,people! Historically, Biot-Savart's Law -> Maxwell Equations -> Special Relativity

    But, I think now, you'll all agree that Special Relativity is the most fundamental of them all. So, why not use Special Relativity to give derivation of Biot-Savart's Law? I think I might write an answer

    – Cheeku Jul 11 '13 at 23:14