Questions tagged [electromagnetism]

The classical theory of electric and magnetic fields, both in the static and dynamic case. It also covers general questions about magnets, electric attraction/repulsion, etc. Distinct from electrical-engineering.

When to Use This Tag


covers the classical description of both static and dynamic electromagnetic phenomena, summarised in Maxwell’s equations. For the discussion of electric circuitry, use instead, while should be used for the (non-classical) QFT approach to electromagnetism. The classical counterpart, is typically used, as an alternative to , to emphasise that the question focuses on the dynamical aspects of electric and magnetic phenomena, as opposed to and .

Introduction

Maxwell's theory provide a classical description of the phenomena arising from static and moving electric charges, either macroscopic or microscopic (such as the electron). The relevant quantities are the electric field $\vec E$ and the magnetic field $\vec B$, which obey (cf. below).

The distinction between electrostatics and electrodynamics is helpful for the following reason: in the static cases, charges affecting an electric field are assumed to be stationary, and currents causing a magnetic field do not change magnitude or direction; thus simplifying the analysis of the equations of motion. The dynamical case allows for both of these to happen, leading to a much richer phenomenology, which includes electromagnetic waves and time-dependent magnetic and electric fields.

Maxwell's equations

An electric charge is often denoted by $q$ and an electric current by $I$. These objects can be written as the integrals of the densities $\rho,\vec j$, known as the charge and current densities. These densities act as sources for the electric field $\vec E$ and the magnetic field $\vec B$, as described by Maxwell's equations: $$ \nabla\cdot\vec E=4\pi\rho$$$$ \nabla\cdot\vec B=0$$$$ \nabla\times\vec E=-\frac{1}{c}\frac{\partial\vec B}{\partial t}$$$$ \nabla\times\vec B=\frac{1}{c}\left(4\pi\vec j+\frac{\partial\vec E}{\partial t}\right) $$

These equations, together with some appropriate boundary conditions, determine the value of the electric and magnetic fields uniquely. The solutions typically exhibit radiation phenomena, in the form of electromagnetic waves, cf. . This phenomenon is the origin of, for example, , and is the fundamental principle behind .

For more details, see , , , , and .

Manifest covariance

The electric and magnetic fields can be combined into a single object, known as the field strength tensor, which is a rank-2 anti-symmetric tensor $F^{\mu\nu}$, with components $$ F^{0i}=\frac1cE^i,\qquad F^{ij}=-\epsilon^{ijk}B^k $$

This tensor allows us to recast Maxwell's equations in a manifestly covariant form. To this end, we introduce the so-called four-current, with components $j^\mu=(c\rho,\vec j)$. Using this notation, Maxwell's equation can be written as $$ \partial_\mu F^{\mu\nu}=j^\nu,\qquad \partial_{ [ \alpha } F_{ \beta \gamma ] } = 0 $$

This notation is particularly useful when dealing with dynamic phenomena, such as electromagnetic waves, because the latter propagate at the speed of light, forcing us to analyse the system taking into account all the subtleties of .

For more details, see , , and .

Gauge fields

The equation $\partial_{ [ \alpha } F_{ \beta \gamma ] } = 0$, together with some regularity conditions, implies that there exists a four-vector $A^\mu$, called the four-potential, such that $$ F_{\mu\nu} = \partial_\mu A_\nu - \partial_\nu A_\mu $$ holds. The object $A$ is known as a gauge field, and a redefinition of the form $$ A_\mu\to A_\mu+\partial_\mu\lambda $$ for an arbitrary function $\lambda$, is known as a gauge transformation. One readily checks that the strength tensor is invariant under these transformations. The general theory of gauge fields and gauge transformations is known as , and is a major topic in modern physics, such as , , , etc.

17979 questions
38
votes
10 answers

A contradiction between Biot-Savart and Ampère-Maxwell Laws?

I came across a problem that I cannot get my head around. Consider two very small spherical metallic balls given charges $+Q$ and $-Q$. Assume that both can be approximated as point charges. Now, they are connected by a straight, finite, conducting…
Newton
  • 787
35
votes
2 answers

Do magnets wear out?

Can a magnet ever wear out or lose strength? If you break a magnet it (seemingly) gets weaker, but what about from normal use? Or even very heavy use, like placing 2 magnets facing each other, so that they detract from each other, does that strain…
Welz
  • 439
30
votes
6 answers

What non-metal is attracted by a magnet?

Are there any non-metal objects that are attracted by magnets?
Franklin
  • 411
19
votes
2 answers

Why do earphone pieces repel each other when music is on?

I know it has to do with electricity flowing and generating a magnetic field, but I would like a thorough explanation (with perhaps a picture). In particular: What is in the ear piece? Why do they repel as opposed to attract? How come my ear buds…
Tom
  • 291
18
votes
5 answers

Is aluminium magnetic?

From high school, I remember that Aluminium has 13 electrons and thus has an unpaired electron in the 3p shell. This should make Aluminium magnetic. However, the wiki page of Aluminium says its non-magnetic at one place(with a citation needed tag…
apoorv020
  • 341
17
votes
4 answers

If electromagnetic induction generates a potential difference in a loop, where are the "high" and "low" potentials?

In AP Physics, I learned that when a changing magnetic flux generates an electromotive force around a loop, and emf is measured in volts, where are the "high" and "low" points to measure the potential difference? Also, how is electromagnetic…
Ming-Tang
  • 257
17
votes
6 answers

Is it possible to project a magnetic field at a location in space?

A magnetic field strength drops-off quickly as the distance from a magnet increases. Is there any way to use electromagnetic fields to create a magnetic field at a location. For example, if there are strong electromagnetic fields intersecting at a…
Phil
  • 643
15
votes
2 answers

Does a time-varying electric field, which is produced by a time-varying magnetic field, itself induce an other magnetic field?

Based on the Maxwell equations we know that A time-varying magnetic field induces an electric field A time-varying electric field induces a magnetic field Suppose that an electric field, which is induced by a time-varying magnetic field, is…
alireza
  • 273
15
votes
8 answers

Electric field near a conducting surface vs. sheet of charge

I know perfectly well how to derive the magnitude of the electric field near a conductor, $$E = \frac{\sigma}{\varepsilon_0}$$ and near a sheet of charge, $$ E = \frac{\sigma}{2\varepsilon_0} .$$ In fact, I can explain with clarity each step of the…
user20250
15
votes
6 answers

Will an emf be induced across the ends of a stationary metal rod placed in a time-varying magnetic field?

Consider a thin metal rod placed in a magnetic field whose direction is constant but whose magnitude is changing with time, with the length of the rod perpendicular to the direction of the magnetic field. The rod is stationary, so there is no…
Amu
  • 473
14
votes
3 answers

The relation between permittivity and conductivity

I am able to measure relative permittivity $\varepsilon_r$ of a fluid, and I want to calculate conductivity of same fluid. Can anyone suggest me how to do this? I found one formula to calculate conductivity but I am not sure it is right or wrong.…
verendra
  • 289
14
votes
4 answers

Transformer ratios - 1:2 vs 50:100

I am only the equivalent of a high school student, so please, if possible, don't answer this question with anything too complex or really advanced university level. I am very happy to research new concepts anyone mentions, but can you please keep it…
niemiro
  • 243
13
votes
3 answers

There is no such thing as magnetism?

Here's an interesting "proof" that there is no such thing as magnetism. I know the answer but I love this so much I had to ask it here. It's a great way to confuse people! As we all know, $$\nabla \cdot\vec{B} =0$$ Using the divergence theorem, we…
user20250
13
votes
4 answers

A paradox regarding the Larmor formula

According to the Larmor formula, the power radiated by an accelerated electron is $P_0=\frac{e^2 a^2}{6\pi \varepsilon_0 c^3}$. Radio waves can be radiated from an antenna by accelerating electrons in the antenna. Suppose the number of accelerating…
Ebi
  • 1,106
13
votes
4 answers

Is the Abraham-Minkowski controversy resolved?

A paper was published in 2010 claiming to resolve the Abraham-Minkowski controversy. Is this paper viewed as definitive by physicists? Paper: https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/26871/5/AbMinPRL.pdf
Humble
  • 2,194
1
2 3
99 100