Questions tagged [gravity]

Gravity is an attractive force that affects and is affected by all mass and - in general relativity - energy, pressure, and stress. Prefer newtonian-gravity or general-relativity if sensible.

When to Use This Tag

covers the discussion of the attractive force of gravity independently of a specific theory, which could describe or explain this force. Hence, you should use the tag when comparing to or when trying to compare various theories. If you are after particular calculations, prefer or correspondingly.

#Introduction

Gravity is a force that has been observed to affect all bodies with non-zero mass or energy. There are currently two working explanations of gravity (in their respective area of usefulness), but no successful theory has been proposed to explain gravity on a quantum-mechanical level.

Newtonian Gravity

The original description of gravity is based on the assumption of an overall attractive force $\vec F$ between bodies with mass $m_1$ and $m_2$ at a given distance $\vec r$, given by

$$ \vec F = G \frac{m_1 m_2}{r^3} \vec r \quad.$$

This theory does not take into account the gravitational effect of energy, pressure, and stress and fails at large masses.

General Relativity (GR)

GR models gravity as a variation of space and time itself: Large bodies and energy densities bend the four-dimensional spacetime in such a way that an attractive effect between bodies is created. In the limit of small energy/mass densities, GR reproduces newtonian-gravity.

Semi-Classical Gravity

Semi-classical gravity refers to the standard model or quantum field theory on a curved spacetime. In other words, gravity is treated as classical whereas everything else is treated as quantum.

Examples of major results from Semi-Classical Gravity include , , , etc.

Quantum Gravity

So far, no successful quantisation of gravity has been proposed or experimentally proven. Similarly to the gauge bosons $\gamma$, $W^\pm$, $Z^0$, and the various gluons, which mediate the electromagnetic, weak, and strong interactions, another boson, dubbed graviton, is assumed to mediate the gravitational attraction. From the various features of gravity (long-range, always attractive), it is assumed that the graviton is a massless spin-2 boson.

Note that the graviton is not to be confused with the Higgs mechanism, which creates the mass of the gauge bosons in the first place (and has nothing to do with gravity).

String Theory

One popular approach to quantum gravity is . has been successful in reproducing in the low-energy, classical limit. String theory aims not only to be a theory of quantum gravity, but also a , which means it also unifies the other forces, and matter, together. String theory reproduces General Relativity in the non-stringy limit by requiring conformal invariance to constrain the beta functions to vanish.

String theory requires extra dimensions for conformal to vanish, and it also requires supersymmetry to have fermions in its spectrum. Neither of these has been observed to a conclusive position, though the 125 GeV Higgs is a piece of strong evidence for supersymmetry (as in, the , which has been shown to take place in certain realistic string vacua by Kumar, Acharya and Kane) and there has been a recent result hinting at third-generation superpartners being observed at the LHC.

Loop Quantum Gravity

is another well-known theory of quantum gravity that quantises by using different variables, the Ashtekhar variables instead of the standard spacetime metric (with its corresponding le-cevita, or Christoffel connection.). Loop Quantum Gravity is formulated as a first-order theory, which means it uses the vielbin (specifically, the vierbin, a vielbin in 4-dimensional spacetime), i.e. the unit vector in curved spacetime. In fact, loop quantum gravity doesn't directly use the vwierbin, but the viewrbin is divided by the "Imirizzi parameter".

It is well-known that Loop Quantum Gravity produces a , or granular, picture of spacetime; This makes it not lorentz-invariant, which is considered a big problem for loop quantum gravity since Lorentz invariance has been very well-tested to the scale of the Planck length. Sen (2013) also showed that Loop Quantum Gravity does not produce a continuous, or smooth picture, of spacetime at large scales. Furthermore, loop quantum gravity does not incorporate the standard model interactions. This means that loop quantum gravity would need serious refinement.

Related theories

Supergravity and Kaluza - Klein theory

One related theory is theory, Kaluza - Klein Theory attempts to show that General Relativity in a 4 + 1 -dimensional reduces to in a 3 + 1 - dimensional spacetime PLUS Maxwell's electromagnetism () in a 3 + 1 - dimensional spacetime.

is an extension to which also covers the ] and the [. To be consistent, it requires , in order to allow fermions too. also arises in the low-energy, classical limit of super - ies.

5203 questions
8
votes
4 answers

Effects of space mining on Earth's orbit

I was reading a post about space mining, specially lunar mining. I was thinking about what would change in Earth's orbit if we start bringing tons of rocks to it? I mean, in a huge scale. So, would space mining change Earth's orbit in a way to…
nmenezes
  • 193
7
votes
1 answer

Grain of sand attracting the sun?

My friend keeps telling me that according to physics... "The sun attracts a grain of sand on the earth with the same force that the grain of sand attracts the sun" or "A grain of sand on the earth attracts the sun" Is that true? Does in theory a…
Wolf
  • 71
7
votes
2 answers

How do we know that gravity is a fundamental force, rather than an emergent one?

How do we know that gravity is a fundamental force, rather than an emergent one? Also, what are the smallest masses and length scales for which we have measured it?
jjyyss
  • 158
6
votes
3 answers

Can I calculate the height of a cliff from weight of falling object and time taken?

I'm sure a simple question. I have a video of me jumping off a cliff into a river. I want to calculate how high it is. I know my weight, acceleration due to gravity of course, and I can get the time it took to hit the water. Can I calculate…
user2313
6
votes
1 answer

What would gravity be like on a hemispherical planet?

On a hemispherical world half the size of Earth (ignoring that the planet should break apart and become a smaller sphere) what would the gravity be like? How would it change as you traveled from pole to pole along the curved side, as well as down…
DampeS8N
  • 185
6
votes
3 answers

Without gravity, is there still up and down?

I'll try to be clear: example: If you send the ISS far enough for it not to undergo the Earth's gravity anymore, then you turn it and the—sleeping—astronauts in it upside down, when they wake up, will they know/feel that they're not the right way…
5
votes
3 answers

Is it possible to have a floating bullet in the air?

I've been asking myself a question for quite some time : say that a bullet gets out of a gun at 900 km/h (I'm european, hence the metric system). say a train could go in a straight line at 900 km/h say you're at the back of that train, and you'd…
5
votes
1 answer

Crying in microgravity

So I looked around the net and found that you really cant "cry" as we do on earth in space floating around, because the tears would just stay near your eyes, because the pull of gravity is not strong enough. What about in an environment like the…
Rover Eye
  • 155
4
votes
1 answer

Do all atoms in the universe gravitate each other?

I understand that matter will gravitate toward matter. (ex: Earth gravitates a satellite toward it, and the satellite toward Earth.) Does this always apply, regardless of distance?  Take two atoms, the farthest apart in the universe. Do they…
monkey
  • 141
4
votes
4 answers

Has somebody ever tried to measure the gravity oscillations of nearby rotating masses?

I'd like to extend this question: Are Newton's gravity waves detectable by a laser interferometer? but with some changes. Has somebody ever tried to measure the gravity oscillations nearby (< some meters) of such rotating masses (as in Carl…
Georg
  • 6,884
4
votes
2 answers

Thought experiment: Gravitation effect of mass converted to energy

Two masses M1 and M2 are separated by some distance. M1 accelerates towards M2 and reciprocally. Then because e=mc2, M1 converts totally into energy (which I believe would be photons) and vanishes. Question: Does M2 stops accelerating towards M1 at…
Gzorg
  • 143
4
votes
1 answer

Time to collide of hammer vs Moon, feather vs Moon, considering that the Moon is attracted by them (barycenter)

I am an extreme novice in Physics, I am also a beginner in Physics Stack Exchange, and I'm not fluent in English, so please bear with me, consider my question with indulgence. I request indulgence especially because $99\text{%}$ of my question is a…
4
votes
1 answer

Object so massive that it absorbs its own gravitational field?

Is it possible for there to be an object so massive and/or dense that it absorbs its own gravitational energy? I ask this because it occurred to me that if gravity is a type of energy than by the mass energy equivalence the gravitational energy…
tox123
  • 580
4
votes
3 answers

Repulsive gravity

IANAP, so feel free to berate me for thinking apocryphal thoughts! Just as magnetism has two charges, in which particles of like-charge repulse and particles of dissimilar charge attract, might gravity have two charges in which particles of…
dotancohen
  • 4,545
4
votes
2 answers

How come we only feel contact forces?

If I am in an elevator which is accelerating upward I can sense the acceleration because I feel the normal force on my feet. If I am a free-falling elevator and I can float about so that none of the walls are touching me then I won't know that I'm…
math_lover
  • 4,526
  • 10
  • 47
  • 92
1
2 3
11 12