Questions tagged [supersymmetry]

A postulated symmetry between bosonic and fermionic fields in quantum field theories and string theories.

Supersymmetry (SUSY)

A postulated symmetry between bosonic and fermionic fields in quantum field theories and string theories. In non-technical terms, this means that each bosonic field or particle has a fermionic superpartner and vice versa.

The theory of Supersymmetry has been incorporated in the (), theory (Super-Yang-Mills Theory), and most famously String Theory ().

While Supersymmetry remains experimentally unconfirmed, one of its greatest achievements is that the MSSM (which also appears in realistic vacua) predicts a Higgs of mass 125 GeV (which was measured by the LHC recently.), which is contrary to the , which predicts such a mass to be rather unlikely.

Technical details

There are two types of ; worldsheet supersymmetry, and spacetime supersymmetry

Worldsheet supersymmetry

The Ramond-Neveu-Schwarz formalism has explicit worldsheet supersymmetry. Since the RNS Action is given by adding the Polyakov Action to the Dirac action, it is given by:

$${{\mathsf{\mathcal{L}}}_ {RNS}}=\frac{T}{2} h^{\alpha \beta} \left( \partial_\alpha X^\mu \partial_\beta X^\nu +i\hbar c_0 \bar{\psi_\mu} \not{\partial} \psi^\mu \right) g_{\mu\nu}$$

The supersymmetric transformations on the worldsheet can therefore be (almost trivially, by taking variations of this above action) shown to be:

$$\begin{gathered} \delta {X^\mu } \to \bar \epsilon {\psi ^\mu } ; \\ \delta {\psi ^\mu } \to - i \not \partial {X^\mu }\epsilon \\ \end{gathered} $$

Spacetime Supersymmetry

The Green-Schwarz formalism, or the , are with explicit spacetime supersymmetry. The supersymmetric transformations on spacetime are (which is rather intuitive if you compare this to the RNS Worldsheet supersymmetry transformations) given by:

$$\begin{gathered} \delta {\Theta ^{Aa}} \leftrightarrow {\varepsilon ^{Aa}} ; \\ \delta {X^\mu } \leftrightarrow {{\bar \varepsilon }^A}{\gamma ^\mu }{\Theta ^A} ;\\ \end{gathered} $$

1227 questions
13
votes
1 answer

Why must gluinos be spin 1/2 instead of 3/2?

Is there some condition in the N=1 SUSY algebra telling that the spin of the superpartners of gauge bosons (either for colour or for electroweak) must be less than the spin of the gauge boson? I am particularly puzzled because sometimes a…
arivero
  • 1,943
9
votes
1 answer

Naturalness and experiments

Is there an example where model building that is motivated only by Naturalness, has led to experimentally verified observations? If the question is unclear, or if the reader wants more elaboration, then continue reading. Naturalness is defined by 't…
stupidity
  • 1,171
7
votes
1 answer

Are non-supersymmetric GUTs ruled out due to lack of precise gauge coupling unification?

Does there exist any good proposal on how the gauge coupling unification can be fixed in non-supersymmetric GUTs? If not, can we assert that non-supersymmetric GUTs have been experimentally ruled out? Of course, I'm referring to the category of GUTs…
felix
  • 1,756
7
votes
1 answer

Why should SUSY be expected naturally?

In the last 40 years (approximately) people have been "discovering", "rediscovering" and "studying" SUSY as a powerful tool and "symmetry principle". Question: What if SUSY is not realized in Nature at the end? Is SUSY the only path to "relate"…
riemannium
  • 6,491
6
votes
1 answer

WIMPs and Gravitinos

I was just wandering if a gravitino could be in the WIMP class, because they are both massive (admittedly WIMP's more so) and are both weakly interacting and predicted by R-parity. i.e Gravitinos are a sub class of WIMPs.
user21119
5
votes
2 answers

Naturalness, simplicity and SUSY

With the aid of current LHC + (all the known HEP experiments)+ (astrophysical and additional laboratory measurements)... Is SUSY natural? Is it simple? More specifically, what reasons people had (or have) in order to argue the "naturalness" of SUSY?…
riemannium
  • 6,491
5
votes
1 answer

Geometric interpretation of hidden SUSY

Hidden supersymmetry, which is the classical(non-super) symmetry in the form of susy, acting on a non-Grassmann space (e.g., Grassmann space is $(t,x,\theta,\bar{\theta})$, corresponding non-Grassmann space is $(t,x)$)...see the review article on…
Simon
  • 383
5
votes
3 answers

Describe supersymmetry to a non-physicist in few sentences

Can someone help me describe the idea of supersymmetry in a few sentences, to a broad scientific audience? That is, a science or engineering graduate student who hasn't studied much theoretical physics may understand.
5
votes
1 answer

Low-scale supersymmetry

One of the major reasons SUSY was adopted in particle physics is to Naturally have a Higgs boson (a fundamental scalar) at the weak scale. If we abandon this argument, what other motivation for low-scale ($\mathcal{O(1)}$ TeV) SUSY exists?
stupidity
  • 1,171
5
votes
0 answers

How do messenger fields break SUSY in the MSSM?

I have been reading the notes on Supersymmetry by Martin. I am trying to understand gauge mediated symmetry breaking. From what I understand, there is a hidden sector where SUSY is spontaneously broken, there is a messenger superfield and there is a…
venu
  • 419
  • 4
  • 9
4
votes
2 answers

Mathematically: What is SUSY?

Wikipedia says: In particle physics, supersymmetry (often abbreviated SUSY) is a symmetry that relates elementary particles of one spin to other particles that differ by half a unit of spin and are known as superpartners. In a theory with unbroken…
Neo
  • 1,025
  • 11
  • 27
4
votes
1 answer

How to handle Yukawa contractions in calculating SUSY beta functions?

I'm reading Chapter 6 of Martin's introduction to SUSY http://arxiv.org/abs/hepph/9709356, which is about RGEs in the MSSM. I tried to convince myself of some of the calculations, and I was particularly stuck with anything that has Yukawas in it. I…
stupidity
  • 1,171
4
votes
0 answers

Motivating supersymmetry from Deligne's theorem on tensor categories

There are crucially two different incarnations of supersymmetry, whose conflation is the source of much confusion in public discussion. On the one hand there is "low-energy" supersymmetry. This has traditionally been motivated by appeal to…
Urs Schreiber
  • 13,678
4
votes
1 answer

The criterion to obtain covariant spinor derivatives in superspace

It can be simply said that covariant derivatives in 4d superspace are given by $\mathcal{D}_\mu $, $\mathcal{D}_{\alpha}$ and $\mathcal{D}_{\dot{\alpha}}$, so that they commute with the representation of the supercharge generator…
4
votes
1 answer

Spurions in Anomaly Mediated Supersymmetry Breaking

When studying supersymmetry breaking, people often use a spurion chiral superfield to study the soft SUSY breaking terms which enter the Lagrangian ($X=\theta^2 F$). Since we let the spurion couple to every field and assume that the messengers are…
JeffDror
  • 8,984
1
2 3